Showing posts with label POLICE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label POLICE. Show all posts

22 Sept 2014

Blackwater-like contractor SWAT TEAMS now used as PRIVATE SECURITY POLICE in the U.S.

AMERICAN KABUKI


 Blackwater-like contractor seeks to legalize private police in the U.S.

SOURCE
.
.
 
.

There are very few news stories about government overreach that shock me these days, but this week there were two -- both in California. Each came and went with barely a whisper in the media, even from the "liberty" news.

Perhaps we're so bombarded with mafia tactics by the government that some events just get lost in the chaos. And no, one of these developments is NOT the Los Angeles School District acquiring tanks and grenade launchers, although that's probably of equal significance. Below is the first of these local stories. The second will be in a follow-up article.

This is probably the scariest development in law enforcement, ever, and I don't say that lightly. If you thought no-knock SWAT raids to serve warrants for non-violent crimes was the epitome of tyranny, wait until you get a load of private mercenaries conducting special forces-type raids on American citizens.

That's right, a report out of Mendocino, California admits that Blackwater-like private "security" contractors are now being used to "police pot." Mysterious soldiers repelled out of unmarked helicopters fully armed for war to raid legal medical cannabis gardens last month. They didn't identify themselves or present paperwork of any kind. They just destroyed the garden and left. Other witnesses claim this invading army is also "confiscating" product.

AMERICAN KABUKI

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE


The public is supposed to believe Lear is merely an environmental clean-up team doing community service who just so happens to have military special ops capability. How quaint. I didn't know litter maintenance required AR-15s. But who would be opposed protecting the environment? Smart marketing.

TIME goes for the hard close to sell this tyranny by providing legal cover for these raids without warrants, before ending the article as a sponsored post for "regulation" of Lear's "flourishing" domestic mercenary business as the "best thing for locals."

A group of unknown, "heavily-armed" men dressed in camouflage have been dropping from helicopters into marijuana fields in Mendocino County in order to chop down plants and eradicate growing operations.


5 Sept 2014

Philadelphia Police Stealing Hundreds Of Homes by extortion theft and blackmail

 



Law enforcement has turned upside down and is in fact a business with business goals and business practices, such as using every "sale" opportunity, and if there's not enough of them, create new ones by "marketing". Seriously, if you look from that angle, you will see how perfectly it all fits. Notice the statement from the district attorneys office about "usually we end up with a settlement" (blackmail). I bet that implies also not going public on the details. It's just plain extortion, theft and blackmail.

Bureaucracy becomes the norm and bureaucrats receive the green light to create more and more statutes to violate, while enjoying popular support in "enforcing the law". That, in a nutshell, is how it works in the US, and this is the answer WHY. Because people agreed that the letter of the law is the king - rather than common sense and justice.



Philadelphia police 

putting homeowners on the street

 

 

29 May 2014

UK POLICE GROOMING CHILDREN : Lambeth Police Station Paedo Sex Ring Dungeon Scandal

the tap 



In November 1997 the South London Press reported the finding of a sex dungeon complete with manacles , chains , bedding and a sleazy red light in Lambeth High-Security Police Head Quarters in South London. The civilian staff who leaked the story were suspended and Officers from Scotland Yard’s Criminal Investigation Bureau were called in. From the copious amounts of child pornography found at the Police Station, it was soon realised that Children from Lambeth Care Homes were being taken to the Police Station for sexual abuse, rape and use in child pornography. It is believed several senior Police Officers were renting out Children and using the Police Station as a brothel.

Detective Chief Inspector Clive Driscoll was put on the case and he soon started following up leads. However when his leads led him to politicians, including at least one who was a Lambeth Labour Councillor and is now an MP, he was taken off the case and put on disciplinary charges.

However before his removal DCI Clive Driscoll had discovered that all 25 of Lambeth’s Childrens’ Homes had been run by a large paedophile network for over 20 years. There were around 50 Children who had entered Lambeth Childrens’ Homes and never been seen again by their families.

The leader of Lambeth Council at the time was Ted Knight (Labour) who was a close friend of Margaret Hodge (Labour) who was leader of nearby Islington Council. It is believed that Children were “traded” between Lambeth and Islington Councils.

When Councillor Anna Tapsell, who had campaigned against the sexual abuse of Children in Lambeth Care Homes for over twenty years, complained about Driscoll’s removal she was visited and “warned off” by a senior Police Officer.
The Metropolitan Police set up a five year investigation, and as is usual in Britain three low level paedophiles got a couple of years in jail for minor sex offences. The major players all got clean away to continue their “activities“.
The Police never looked for any links between the Lambeth and Islington paedophile rings, but I found some glaringly obvious ones within five minutes. Abraham Jacobs was convicted in 1986 for his part in a paedophile ring that specialised in picking up run away Children in Piccadily Circus to provide for the sexual abuse by BBC Executives and Labour Party Politicians. Abraham Jacobs had worked at both Islington and Lambeth Care Homes and was known to Margaret Hodge, Jack Straw and Ted Knight.

Another link is Michael John Carroll. He was one of the paedophile “fall guys” from the Lambeth Care Home Scandal - this is a quaint British tradition where small time paedophiles get convicted of minor sex offences and all enquiries are then closed in to the bigger picture. Even though he had been a relatively low paid Council Employee, on his release from prison he bought The Hand Hotel on Church Street in Chirk ( just outside Wrexham ) for £725,000 cash. The Crest Hotel in Wrexham is usually linked to the Wrexham Child sex abuse scandal, but The Hand Hotel was also conveniently close to the Wrexham Child sex abuse scandal.

Another link is Jason Hoyte a convicted paedophile. He had been warned off by Police from hanging round Islington Care Homes and had somehow avoided a CRB check and obtained a job as a Youth Worker with Lambeth Council. He was sacked in 2006 after being caught grooming Children for BBC Executives on a Council run Youth training scheme.

HETT


MAINSTREAM MEDIA 
WON'T TOUCH THIS STORY


QUESTION : ARE THERE ANY BIGGER FISH TO FRY ?


 

21 May 2014

SLAVES BEATEN UP HARASSED AND INTIMIDATED BY CORPORATE POLICE THUGS FOR COMPLAINING ABOUT HARSH CONDITIONS

 


Migrant workers, in their tiny apartment in Abu Dhabi, earn as little as $272 a month while building a campus for New York University.
 
Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times
 


ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The strike had entered its second day when construction workers at Labor Camp 42 got word that their bosses from the BK Gulf corporation had come to negotiate. Mohammed Amir Waheed Sirkar, an electrician from Bangladesh, scrambled down the stairs to meet them. But when he got to the courtyard, he saw the truth: It wasn’t the bosses who had come. It was the police.

They pounded on doors, breaking some down, and hauled dozens of men to prison. Mr. Sirkar was taken to a Dubai police station, where officers interrogated him. After a while, new officers arrived. That’s when things got rough.

“They beat me up,” he said through an Urdu interpreter, “asking me to confess I was involved in starting the strike.” Others were slapped, kicked, or beaten with shoes, a special indignity in Arab culture.

After nine days in jail, Mr. Sirkar was deported, as were hundreds of other workers.



Immigrants account for 85 percent of the population in the U.A.E. Migrant construction workers can work 12 hours a day, 6 or 7 days a week.

Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times


The forceful response was typical for the United Arab Emirates, where strikes are illegal and labor conditions grim, but most of the men who went on strike last October were working on a project that originated in America: a large new campus for New York University.

Facing criticism for venturing into a country where dissent is not tolerated and labor can resemble indentured servitude, N.Y.U. in 2009 issued a “statement of labor values” that it said would guarantee fair treatment of workers. But interviews by The New York Times with dozens of workers who built N.Y.U.’s recently completed campus found that conditions on the project were often starkly different from the ideal.

Virtually every one said he had to pay recruitment fees of up to a year’s wages to get his job and had never been reimbursed. N.Y.U.’s list of labor values said that contractors are supposed to pay back all such fees. Most of the men described having to work 11 or 12 hours a day, six or seven days a week, just to earn close to what they had originally been promised, despite a provision in the labor statement that overtime should be voluntary.

The men said they were not allowed to hold onto their passports, in spite of promises to the contrary. And the experiences of the BK Gulf strikers, a half dozen of whom were reached by The Times in their home countries, stand in contrast to the standard that all workers should have the right to redress labor disputes without “harassment, intimidation, or retaliation.”



Construction workers can live as many as 15 men to a room. Space is so scarce that a dozen men can share a space of barely 200 square feet. One of New York University’s labor values states that contractors should not house more than four people in a bedroom.

Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times


Some men lived in squalor, 15 men to a room. The university said there should be no more than four.

“Not happy,” Munawar, a painter from Bangladesh who only gave one name declared, speaking in limited English. Back home, he said, they have lives, families. “Come here,” he concluded, “not happy.”

N.Y.U. Abu Dhabi is a bold undertaking, matching the ambitions of one of the world’s wealthiest nations with those of America’s largest private university. It is also one of the most closely watched of a growing number of experiments in academic globalization. N.Y.U.’s president, John Sexton, has called the outpost, an entire degree-granting institution, “an opportunity to transform the university and, frankly, the world.”

But Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates, is an unlikely setting for a university built on the American model. Academic freedom is unheard-of, criticizing government is a crime and an employment system known as kafala leaves millions of immigrant workers tethered to the companies that sponsor their visas.



Slide Show | The Luxurious Side of Abu Dhabi About 85 percent of the population of the United Arab Emirates are immigrants, with only 15 percent being Emiratis who enjoy a finer way of life.


N.Y.U. has said the campus will be built and run as a “cultural free zone,” where the university’s core values prevail, from the treatment of workers to the protection of scholarly inquiry. The university says that its efforts to ensure humane living and working conditions have been unprecedented.

Told of the laborers’ complaints, officials said they could not vouch for the treatment of individual construction workers, since they are not employees of the university but rather of companies that work as contractors or subcontractors for the government agency overseeing the project. Those companies are contractually obligated to follow the statement of labor values.

To help monitor the situation, an engineering firm, Mott MacDonald, has been on hand to interview workers and prepare annual reports. The latest, released last month, noted some challenges, including a single contractor who fell behind on one month’s wages, but concluded, “Over all, there is strong evidence confirming the N.Y.U.A.D. project is taking workers’ rights seriously.”

The report made no mention of the BK Gulf strike, or the strikers’ demands for more pay.



Immigrant workers shop for food and other supplies at the weekend market outside a labor camp in Abu Dhabi. Many South Asian laborers live in grim conditions to earn money to send back home to their families.

Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times


Mott MacDonald declined to discuss its report. John Beckman, N.Y.U.’s chief spokesman, said in a recent email that university officials were not aware of any unrest and were “working with our partners to have it investigated.”

Luxury Next Door

N.Y.U. Abu Dhabi rises just to the northeast of the city’s busy downtown, on a vast sun-baked expanse called Saadiyat Island. The island, whose name means “happiness” in Arabic, is being developed as a world-class culture destination, with outposts of the Louvre and the Guggenheim Museum that, like its neighbor, were paid for by Abu Dhabi’s ruler, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan.

The broad slope of a lacy dome is just now coming into view on the Louvre’s site. The Guggenheim is still just a building-size hole, with a skeleton crew of workers pumping out water. But both museum projects have attracted unwelcome attention from human rights groups. In March, members of Gulf Labor, a group of artists and writers, unfurled protest banners in the Guggenheim’s New York home to call attention to working conditions in Abu Dhabi.



N.Y.U.’s construction at Saadiyat Island is now complete.

Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times


Richard Armstrong, the Guggenheim’s director, said it was committed to fair labor standards and noted that “the Guggenheim Abu Dhabi is not yet under construction.”

N.Y.U.’s construction is now complete. When the undergraduate program, which has so far been operating out of temporary facilities, holds its first graduation on Sunday at the new campus, former President Bill Clinton will be on hand to usher N.Y.U. into the next phase of its life as a “global network university.”

A vast majority of the roughly 6,000 people who built that campus have been housed in large labor camps. Security guards keep visitors from entering those camps, but N.Y.U. officials say the conditions there are excellent, with what are described as “on-site leisure facilities” and “a wide range of recreational pursuits.”

The company Munawar works for, City Falcon, housed him, along with a few dozen other laborers, in a small tenement building in the city’s business district.

Just a few blocks up the street are the modern buildings that have served as N.Y.U.’s temporary campus; a few blocks in the other direction is the stunning ultraluxury hotel where the university has staged cultural events.

Inside City Falcon’s squalid quarters, the bedrooms are so crowded that the men must sleep three to a stack — one on the upper bunk, one on the lower bunk and one below the lower bunk, separated from the floor by only a thin pad for a mattress. In the space between the beds, the men pile cauliflower, onions and 75-pound sacks of Basmati rice to cook after working all day and washing the construction dirt from their clothes. Tangles of exposed wiring hang down from the ceiling, and cockroaches climb the walls.

In the smaller of the two rooms in this apartment, where the only window is covered over, more than a dozen men share a space of barely 200 square feet. They drape towels down from the bed above them to eke out a tiny realm of privacy.

The men who live there, like millions of other South Asian laborers in Abu Dhabi, came for one reason: to earn money for their families back home. One City Falcon employee, a soft-spoken man with a boyish face, is helping support five brothers. Another supports four children, ages 6 to 14. Others have toddlers they have never met.

One painter said he was promised a base pay of 1,500 dirham a month, or $408. After he arrived, he said, he found out it would be 700 dirham, about what other Saadiyat Island construction workers have been reported to make.

Overtime boosts that to 1,000 dirham, or $272. But food costs more than a third of that. Cellphones, the men’s lifeline to the world they left behind, take another cut. And the annual raises they were promised have not materialized. Even working 11 hours a day, six days a week, they struggle to send home much more than $100 a month.

That is how the numbers work on paper; in reality they are far worse. Almost all of the several dozen workers interviewed, working for a variety of companies and living at a half-dozen labor camps, said that a recruiter back home charged them about a year’s wages to land them the jobs. (Recruitment fees are widespread in the U.A.E., despite being officially illegal; Human Rights Watch calls them “the single greatest factor in creating conditions of forced labor.”)

The City Falcon workers, like all the men interviewed, said they were not allowed to keep their own passports. A group of laborers in a nearby apartment who had recently finished installing furniture on the Saadiyat Island campus said they were not even allowed to hold their own bank cards. To get cash they have to ask the man they called the “owner”: the recruiter who brought them over from Bangladesh, who sleeps in the room with them.

Attempts to reach City Falcon managers were not successful.

BK Gulf, the company whose workers went on strike last October, said it was “obliged by confidentiality clauses to make no comment whatsoever without the express permission of our client.” Mubadala, the government entity overseeing the construction of the N.Y.U. campus, said it would not comment on any aspect of the project.

Challenging the System

By laying out its standards for labor in a country with no tradition of workers’ rights, N.Y.U. took on a considerable challenge — one that many companies in the region are content to ignore. Sustaining the academic freedom that is a core value of its New York campus will pose a similar challenge. In both cases, the challenge is made more complex by the fact that the university is in effect a guest of the ruling family, which has not only paid for the 21-building campus and for generous tuition subsidies, but also has contributed the first of what are expected to be several $50 million donations to N.Y.U. as a whole.

In recent years, the United Arab Emirates, which has been accused of torturing political prisoners, has intensified its crackdown on dissent. And though neighboring Qatar, which is preparing for the 2022 World Cup, recently announced reforms to the kafala system, in U.A.E. it remains firmly in place.

On some of the labor protections that N.Y.U. set forth, including a ban on child labor and a requirement that workers get free transportation to their job sites, The Times’s reporting turned up no violations.

Margaret Bavuso, the executive director of campus operations for N.Y.U. Abu Dhabi, said she had worked closely with contractors and the government of Abu Dhabi to ensure better conditions than laborers in the U.A.E. could otherwise expect. “The government has become much, much more responsive in the time that we’ve been here,” she said, citing among other things new rules to ban outdoor work during the hottest hours of the hottest months.

She is especially proud of the university’s safety record, achieved in part through a program that rewards workers who notice potential hazards. According to the university, only one worker has died, and its accident rate — 0.03 accidents per 100,000 work hours — was far lower than at other large-scale construction jobs, including Olympic Park in London, which had a rate of 0.16.

At one of the recent safety awards ceremonies, Ms. Bavuso said, Al Bloom, the vice chancellor of N.Y.U. Abu Dhabi, addressed thousands of laborers who had come from countries like India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Ms. Bavuso says he told them: “All of you have worked so very hard on this project. Your children are benefiting from the work that you do on this project. There is no reason that those children, as they get educated in your country, that they can’t apply to go to school here. And just think about how exciting it would be for them to attend a school that you built.’ ”

Mr. Beckman, the N.Y.U. spokesman, disputed that some workers are not paid a living wage. “Wages on the N.Y.U.A.D. project are designed to place workers at the top of the range in their respective categories,” he said.

But in a separate interview, Ms. Bavuso said that beyond setting forth the broad principle of fair compensation, N.Y.U. does not actually monitor what the construction companies pay their workers, nor should it. “We’re not involved in the negotiation of the contracts that the partners are doing, just as they’re not in the negotiation of the contracts that we’re doing,” she said. “We have a relationship with our partners, and so we have to trust that what they’re coming up with are the reasonable wages on their end.”

N.Y.U. officials said that no complaints had been raised about the treatment of the security guards, cafeteria cooks and secretaries who staffed N.Y.U. Abu Dhabi’s temporary location while its permanent campus was being built. Over the years, 19 of them were identified as having paid a recruitment fee, and they were reimbursed, officials said.

As for the men who were building the new campus — who outnumber those nonconstruction staff members by about 30 to 1 — Ms. Bavuso drew a distinction. Construction workers who “were recruited for this job,” she said, are treated with the same protections as the university’s own staff. But that is not possible, she said, for a worker brought over by a construction company and moved from site to site.

The construction workers, however, did not describe having been recruited for any particular job site. They say they were recruited by manpower agencies or by construction companies that, like most large contractors, have people stationed at several job sites. The men might spend five months on one project, two years on another, just going where they are sent.

Stuck in Limbo

With major construction at N.Y.U. now concluded, most workers have moved on to other job sites. Those who were arrested for striking are back in their home countries.

Ramkumar Rai and Tibendra Kota, two Nepali men who worked for a contractor, Robodh, on the N.Y.U. site (for months, in Mr. Rai’s case; years, in Mr. Kota’s), are still in limbo.

From a certain perspective, both were success stories. They got promotions. They got raises. They made decent money. But during their last six months on the university site, their employer fell behind on wages. And then in February 2013, their jobs came to an end.

Since then they have asked many times for their back pay, and have even gone to the company’s headquarters in Dubai, where they say they got a meeting with someone who introduced himself as the chief executive. But they have gotten only tiny sums of cash, and a request that they not pursue the matter in labor court.

It has been 16 months since they were last paid, during which time their work visas expired; even if they decided to give up the fight, they would face stiff exit fines at the airport. They could not afford to fly themselves home anyway: Over the course of more than a year without pay, they have racked up more than $1,000 in debt at the local grocery. So they stay, and they wait.

Jayaprakash Punathil, an assistant general manager at Robodh, said he was not aware of any outstanding payments.

Said Mr. Rai:

“They keep saying, ‘We’ll send the money; we’ll send it,’ but they don’t.”

“There’s no work; there’s no money: It’s really hard,” he said. “Having done so much work, to have no money: It’s so painful.”

Sondra Hausner contributed reporting from Oxford, England, and Kiran Nazish from New York. 

15 May 2014

CAMERON YOUTH SHOCK TROOPS : UK COMMON PURPOSE Children that are born and bred to be obedient

.

Your Future 

Your Police project

.

Instilling values of citizenship 

and public service

. 

 NOTHING TO HIDE? 

NOTHING TO FEAR

.


.
This is the level of totality we are expected to see ... history repeats!

Already been militarised into fear. Their minds had already being corrupted. 


TOO YOUNG TO VOTE




19 Apr 2014

CANADIAN STREET POLITICS 101 : Police THUGS routinely clubbed students





.
 STUDENTS IN SUPPORT OF FREE EDUCATION

ALSO SUPPORTING THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE'S LAND

FROM BEING STOLEN BY CORPORATE GREED
.




In the spring of 2012, a massive student strike in opposition to a tuition hike, rocked the streets of the Montréal for over six months. Protests and militant street actions became part of the daily and nightly reality of this Canadian metropolis. Several times during this tumultuous spring, the numbers in the streets would reach over one hundred thousand. Police routinely clubbed students and their allies, and arrested them by the hundreds. Some were even banned from entering the city. But every time the cops struck, the student movement got bigger and angrier.

This is a story about how the arrogance of a government, underestimated a dedicated group of students, who through long term organizing laid the foundation for some of the largest mass demonstrations in Canada’s history. But it is also a story of how a crews of determined anarchists, educated a new generation of students, in the importance of owning the streets.

In Street Politics 101, subMedia.tv features some of the best footage from what some called “the maple spring.” It also features interviews with students, teachers and anarchists involved in one of the most militant rebellions in Quebec.

Music by MIA, Cairo, CJ Boyd, Di Nigunim, Jordan Brown, Mise En Demeure, Godspeed You Black Emperor, Joy Division, Lee Reed, FreqMan, Bar 9



25 Mar 2014

DARK CABAL'S SUSTAINABILITY AGENDA : BURNING BABY fuel in UK hospitals CHILD trafficking CITIZENS FEAR ROGUE POLICE

 

AGENDA 21

Burning Babies as Fuel: 

A Literal Holocaust

.

As news breaks of aborted babies being used as fuel in UK hospitals, commenters and tweeters defend it as "efficient". As western societies sacrifice their children on the altar of "efficiency", "sustainability" and "prosperity", we can already see the fruits of the suicide cult as police murder with impunity — this time in Albuquerque, NM.

READ MORE HERE


EXPOSED : UK Hospitals Caught Burning Dead Babies - burning aborted foetuses to Heat Buildings

http://theflowofperceptions.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/exposed-uk-hospitals-caught-burning.html


 

  .

Gang Trafficking in Child Organs 

Fought by Mexican Vigilantes 

.

The Knights Templar drug gang is now selling the organs of children and using children's hearts as part of their initiation ceremony. As the gang expands from drugs to protection rackets to trafficking in children's organs, the only effective resistance is coming from vigilante groups, not the government, illustrating yet again how vital an armed citizenry is to society.

.

READ MORE HERE

http://theflowofperceptions.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/mexico-knights-templar-drug-cartel-made.html

.

READ MORE HERE

Mafia works hand in hand with the Vatican to assassinate steal and deal - Mafia Boss interview

. 

READ MORE HERE ON PEDO RINGS

.

 READ MORE HERE

THE VATICAN'S SATANIC COVEN OF PAEDOPHILIA

http://theflowofperceptions.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/kevin-annett-ratzinger-is-acting-pope.html


 

   .

ROGUE Police Execute 

Homeless Man For Camping 

.

You can add one more item to the list of things that will potentially get you killed by police: illegal camping.
New Mexico police are standing by their decision to shoot and kill 38-year-old homeless man James Boyd, who last Sunday made the ill-fated decision to shack up in the Sandia foothills due east of Albuquerque.

CLICK HERE FOR SOCIOPATHIC POLICE

http://theflowofperceptions.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/POLICE

READ MORE HERE ON AGENDA 21

http://theflowofperceptions.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/AGENDA%2021 

CLICK HERE FOR EUGENICS

 http://theflowofperceptions.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/EUGENICS


 

 

 

20 Feb 2014

SOCIOPATHIC POLICE : SHOOT TO KILL ... ASK QUESTIONS LATER



Police Shoot, Kill Man's Dog After Going

To Wrong Home, Told

"You Can Get a New Dog" 

.
An Adams County man is in shock after he says deputies shot and killed his dog.

Jeff Fisher said deputies went to his house by mistake. He said when they forced their way through the door his dog Ziggy ran outside and an Adams County Sheriff's deputy shot and killed him.

"(He went to the door) to see who it was and the police officer shot him three times," Fisher said. "They killed my dog for no reason."

Fisher said Ziggy was his best friend and can't believe he's gone.

"I called the dog, he turned to come back to me and the police officer opened fire," said Fisher.

Ziggy was an 8-year-old Blue Healer/Border Collie mix.

The Adams County Sheriff's Office said deputies responded to the address on reports of a business alarm going off.

A spokesman said he can't say more until the investigation is complete but did release this statement, "It's our goal at the Adams County Sheriff's Office to complete a thorough investigation of this incident, be able to answer any questions that people who have concerns about this incident may have and to do right for the owner of this dog."

Fisher said he wants that deputy to be held accountable.

"I'm on the ground crying hysterically and the police officer says, 'You need to calm down, you can get a new dog,'" said Fisher.

Fisher said he rents space from the neighboring business where the alarm was sounded.

The attorney representing Fisher believes that animal shootings are out of control.

Jennifer Edwards referred to the elk in Boulder and the dog in Commerce City that were recently shot and killed by law enforcement.

"Something has got to be done about it. They're taking our family members and I don't care that they're the furry family members they're family members no less," said Edwards.

Edwards wants answers and reform on how law enforcement deals with animals. She believes a lawsuit is likely.

Fisher said he just wants his friend back, "I don't have kids. That's my son."






Police Shoot, Kill 80-Year-Old Man

In His Own Bed, Don't Find the Drugs

They Were Looking For 

.
In the early morning hours of June 27, 2013, a team of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department deputies pulled up to the home of Eugene Mallory, an 80-year-old retired engineer living in the rural outskirts of Los Angeles county with his wife Tonya Pate and stepson Adrian Lamos.

The deputies crashed through the front gate and began executing a search warrant for methamphetamine on the property. Detective Patrick Hobbs, a self-described narcotics expert who claimed he "smelled the strong odor of chemicals" downwind from the house after being tipped off to illegal activity from an anonymous informant, spearheaded the investigation.

The deputies announced their presence, and Pate emerged from the trailer where she'd been sleeping to escape the sweltering summer heat of the California desert. Lamos and a couple of friends emerged from another trailer, and a handyman tinkering with a car on the property also gave himself up without resistance. But Mallory, who preferred to sleep in the house, was nowhere to be seen.

Deputies approached the house, and what happened next is where things get murky. The deputies said they announced their presence upon entering and were met in the hallway by the 80-year-old man, wielding a gun and stumbling towards them. The deputies later changed the story when the massive bloodstains on Mallory's mattress indicated to investigators that he'd most likely been in bed at the time of the shooting. Investigators also found that an audio recording of the incident revealed a discrepancy in the deputies' original narrative: Before listening to the audio recording, [Sgt. John] Bones believed that he told Mallory to "Drop the gun" prior to the shooting. The recording revealed, however, that his commands to "Drop the gun" occurred immediately after the shooting.

When it was all over, Eugene Mallory died of six gunshot wounds from Sgt. John Bones' MP-5 9mm submachine gun. When a coroner arrived, he found the loaded .22 caliber pistol the two deputies claimed Mallory had pointed at them on the bedside table.

Mallory had not fired of a single shot. The raid turned up no evidence of methamphetamine on the property.

To find out more about this case, including details about what the police did find, watch the above video, featuring Mallory's widow Tonya Pate. Pate has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, an agency plagued by prison abuse scandals, questionable hiring practices, and allegations of racial profiling and harassment in recent years.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department declined multiple requests to comment on this story.





11 Dec 2013

GLOBAL AWAKENING : Thai and Italian Police Lay Down Riot Gear in SOLIDARITY

 

Thai police and protestors remove

 barriers, call truce 




Riot Police Remove Their Helmets 

in Solidarity With Italian Protesters 

In italy during a demonstration against government measures and impotent politics, riot police understand the gravity of the actual Italian situation and decide to follow the people.

 

24 Nov 2013

STORMTROOPERS : Taiwan Special Forces Unveil Scary New Look



With the increase toward further “security” and consequential police militarization, law enforcement officers have recently more often resembled soldiers or stormtroopers instead of the peace keepers that the people of their communities, or nation, would expect them to be.


With the ever expanding usage of drones, armored vehicles, and high-capacity automatic weapons, it’s no wonder that there is growing paranoia and fear toward those who sport a shiny badge and uniform, and other authority figures who carry out the will of the government. Taiwan has taken their special forces gear to a whole new level of scary. The uniforms, recently unveiled by the Taiwanese government, feature bullet-proof armor and a terrifying and extremely concealing ballistic face mask.

The armor is designed to protect the wearer from close range shots, but critics have said that they more closely resemble something from a horror movie than they do any sort of police officer or soldier. They may not have any peripheral vision, but they successfully achieve the intended intimidation factor. It is alleged that the masks can shield the soldiers from close-range shots from a .44 magnum, and that the mask distributes the impact of the bullet over a condensed surface area. One has to wonder what the restricted vision will do for their combat effectiveness though, or how it might hold up against a molotov cocktail, which currently seems to be the weapon of choice by violent demonstrators.



Shouldn’t their faces be identifiable if they are going to be held accountable for their actions? Or are we supposed to hold the entire group accountable for the actions of a few? The soldiers’ vision is exchanged for the ability to avoid being wounded from bullets, shrapnel and other ballistic threats to the face. It is made of Kevlar, and padding covering the forehead, cheeks and chin. It is actually recommended that those who wear these masks shouldn’t expect to proficiently jump, climb or crawl while wearing the gear because it will impede their ability to do so.

With the continued growth of extreme economic disparity worldwide, the increased prevalence of those suffering from poor living conditions, and with limited options available to them for help, there has understandably been an increase in protests and demonstrations worldwide. Millions of individuals are educating themselves about their nations representatives, and more rapidly accepting the truth that their public representatives do not have their best interest set as their main objective. Those representatives instead want to keep servicing and benefiting multi-billion dollar corporations and international banking cartels, turning their back on the entire reason they have employment as a representative in the first place. With the rise in frequency of social demonstrations, there has been a rise toward a more invasive security and police state, and further militarization of domestic police forces.

japanpoliceThese representatives of the people seem to be forgetting an inconvenient [for them] truth: that the collective citizenry is where they derive every vestige of their authority from. Worrisome is the trend of government and authority figures who continue creating an ever-widening division between them and the people, fostering an “us versus them” mentality. Most of the time authority figures working on behalf of the state are more of a threat to freedom and security than any concerned citizen, against whom they commonly initiate aggression and who they seem to always consider a potential terrorist.
SOURCE
http://www.exposingthetruth.co/taiwa...#axzz2lVWEfuaS




4 Nov 2013

Police State Britain : The so-called “enemy” apparently is “we the people.”

 

by Stephen Lendman

police state

Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) operates like NSA. They work cooperatively. They’re out-of-control rogue agencies.

They spy on their own populations. They do it globally. They conduct espionage. They collect enormous amounts of personal information. They do it illegally.

Obama wages war on freedom. He targets whistleblowers and investigative journalists exposing government wrongdoing. So does Britain. It equates doing so with terrorism.

London’s Guardian is threatened. Its offices were raided. Hard drive stored information was destroyed. Its editor, Alan Rusbridger, was warned. Cease and desist or else.

He asked if steps would be taken “to close down the Guardian’s reporting through a legal route – by going to court to force the surrender of the material on which we were working.”


“The official confirmed that, in the absence of handover or destruction, this was indeed the government’s intentions.”

It was “one of the more bizarre moments in the Guardian’s long history,” he said. It was likely the most chilling.

Two GCHQ security experts oversaw the destruction of Guardian hard drives. They checked to be sure nothing but “mangled bits of metal” remained.

Whitehall was satisfied. Freedom in Britain sustained another body blow. It’s fast disappearing like in America. Both nations are more police states than democracies.

They mock virtually all democratic principles. They govern lawlessly. They do it ruthlessly. Sweeping surveillance is official policy. So is suppressing information about government wrongdoing.

Journalists involved in exposing it are threatened. Guardian disclosures fall under parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee’s remit.

It reinforces government claims about compromising national security. When good journalism is equated with doing it, freedom dies.

Guardian contributors are targeted for doing their job. Doing so amounts to state censorship. Warnings about prosecutions and imprisonments follow.

Free expression is the most important of all rights. Without it, all others at risk. On the bogus pretext of fighting terrorism, America and Britain want none of their lawless activities exposed.

On August 18, UK authorities detained Glenn Greenwald’s partner, David Miranda, at Heathrow Airport.

He was held incommunicado for nine hours. He was denied legal counsel. A counterterrorism law pretext was used to do so.

He was in transit from Berlin to Rio de Janeriro. He threatened no one. He violated no laws. It didn’t matter.

His laptop, cell phone, camera, memory sticks, DVDs and game consoles were confiscated. It was done lawlessly. Police states operate this way.

London’s Observer said Miranda was detained “for promoting ‘political’ causes.” His detention shone “new light on the Metropolitan police’s explanation for invoking terrorism powers – a decision critics have called draconian.”

London’s Mirror headlined “David Miranda detention shows UK is becoming a police state.” Targeting him “shows just how determined the security services are to get the upper hand.”

“Big Brother isn’t just watching you. He knows which plane you’re on, where you’re traveling, and he’s in close contact with Big Daddy across the water in Washington.”

It “illustrates the general point that we are now living in a security state.”

“Historically, the national interest has always been what’s good for the government, not what’s right for the people.”

It’s more than ever true today. State-of-the-art technology makes it easy. So do rogue politicians wanting unchallenged control.

Greenwald called detaining his partner “a failed attempt at intimidation.” I’ll have the opposite effect, he said. Virtually never are in transit passengers detained like Miranda.

Schedule 7 of Britain’s Terrorism Act says “fewer than 3 people in every 10,000 are examined as they pass through UK borders.” Over 97% of examinations last under an hour.

Individuals are questioned regarding possible involvement “in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.”

Miranda didn’t enter Britain. He was en route to Rio. Targeting him was unrelated to terrorism. It was intimidation. It was harassment. Downing Street was directly involved.

It sent a message. Responsible journalism exposing government wrongdoing is threatened. Authorities want it entirely eliminated.

Miranda was released uncharged. Journalists, editors, human rights lawyers and civil libertarians expressed outrage over what happened. Doing so reflects police state harshness.

UK Metropolitan police lied saying:

“Holding and properly using intelligence gained from such stops is a key part of fighting crime, pursuing offenders and protecting the public.”

Police states justify lawlessness this way. Miranda was threatened. He was treated like a criminal.

He was told he faced prosecution if he didn’t cooperate. He did nothing wrong. It didn’t matter. It got worse.

On September 6, Britain’s high court said government authorities could continue examining materials seized from him.

They could do it to determine if he violated Britain’s Terrorism and Official Secrets Acts. UK courts lack independence like America’s.

They support the worst of government practices. They rubber-stamp some of the most outrageous acts. They violate fundamental freedoms doing so.

On November 2, Reuters headlined “NSA Leaks Journalist Glenn Greenwald’s Partner Accused of ‘Terrorism,’ ‘Espionage.’

After returning to Rio, Miranda filed suit. He wants lawlessly seized materials returned.

“At a London court hearing a document called a ‘Ports Circulation Sheet’ was read into the record.”

“It was prepared by Scotland Yard – in consultation with the MI5 counterintelligence agency.”

It said “(i)intelligence indicates that Miranda is likely to be involved in espionage activity which has the potential to act against the interests of UK national security.”

“We assess that Miranda is knowingly carrying material the release of which would endanger people’s lives.”

“Additionally the disclosure, or threat of disclosure, is designed to influence a government and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause. This therefore falls within the definition of terrorism.”

Miranda wasn’t charged. At least not so far. He remains threatened. He may become as much at risk as Edward Snowden.

A hearing on Miranda’s legal challenge is scheduled this week. During a preparatory session days earlier, “new details of how and why British authorities (targeted him) were made public…”

Materials authorities seized allegedly included 58,000 NSA and GCHQ documents. In an email to Reuters, Greenwald said:

“For all the lecturing it doles out to the world about press freedoms, the UK offers virtually none. They are absolutely and explicitly equating terrorism with journalism.”

On October 31, German lawmaker Hans-Christian Stroebele met with Edward Snowden. He did so in Moscow. He released a letter he wrote. In part, it said:

“I have been invited to write to you regarding your investigation of mass surveillance.”

“I believe I witnessed systemic violations of law by my government that created a moral duty to act.”

“As a result of reporting these concerns, I have faced a severe and sustained campaign of persecution that forced me from my family and home.”

“Citizens around the world as well as high officials – including in the United States – have judged the revelation of an unaccountable system of pervasive surveillance to be a public service.”

“Though the outcome of my efforts has been demonstrably positive, my government continues to treat dissent as defection, and seeks to criminalize political speech with felony charges that provide no defense.”

“(S)peaking truth is not a crime.” He thanked supporters for their “efforts in upholding the international laws that protect us all.”

Not in America or Britain. In a document read into the public record, Britain’s MI5 said:

“Our main objectives against David Miranda are to understand the nature of any material he is carrying (so as to) mitigate the risks to national security that this material poses.”

A UK Washington spokesperson had no comment. Equating good journalism with terrorism shows Britain will stop at nothing to keep government wrongdoing secret.

Doing so shows how low Britain has sunk. Its stripped off facade reveals dark side tyranny.

Britain’s Terrorism Law provides wide latitude. Its terrorism definition includes a “use or threat designed to influence the government (or international governmental organization).”

It’s “made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, or ideological cause.”

It does so if it “endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action (and) creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public.”

Most chilling is that UK security services, on their own, can decide if legitimate journalism is terrorism or its equivalent.

They can do so without publicly releasing materials allegedly able to compromise national security. They can pronounce guilt on their say alone. They can get courts to rubber-stamp their accusations.

It’s much the same in America. Government whistleblowers are threatened. They’re fraudulently charged under the long ago outdated Espionage Act.

It’s a WW I relic. It belongs in history’s dustbin. It’s unrelated to exposing government wrongdoing. Revealing it is equated with aiding the enemy.

The so-called “enemy” apparently is “we the people.” Our fundamental constitutional rights are threatened. Upholding them is what courts are supposed to do.

Not in America. Not in Britain. Terrorism or acts relating to it are what both governments say they are.

On July 30, Bradley Manning was wrongfully convicted on 20 of 22 bogus charges. He never had a chance.

He was judged guilty by accusation. He got 35 years imprisonment for acting responsibly.

It’s by far the harshest ever punishment for leaking information everyone has a right to know.

Washington wants Edward Snowden prosecuted the same way. Russia granted him political asylum.

Whether he’ll stay free remains to be seen. He’s America’s public enemy number one. Safety is his main concern.

He’s got good reason to worry. He’s a wanted man. He knows how NSA operates. It’ll try monitoring him every way possible.

Whether he’ll stay free from its tracking remains to be seen. The same is true for everyone.

America and Britain are ruthless. They’re unforgiving. They want unchallenged power. They want no one compromising it.

They want government wrongdoing suppressed. UK Prime Minister David Cameron threatened Britain’s media with injunctions or so-called D (Defense Advisory) notices.

They’re official requests not to publish or broadcast information for reasons of national security.

London’s Guardian and Miranda remain in limbo. Criminal charges could follow. Responsible journalism is threatened.

It bears repeating. Equating it with terrorism shows how low Britain has sunk. The same holds for America.

Police state justice prevails.




25 Oct 2013

Occupy 'pepper-spray cop' awarded $38k for 'anxiety and stress'



Assaulting peaceful protesters with pepper spray can be awfully stressful, and John Pike certainly knows it better than most. Now a judge has awarded $38,000 to the former University of California cop filmed discharging his weapon on Occupy demonstrators.