8 May 2014

NEIL KEENAN UPDATE | Karen Hudes: What The Flack?



By Neil Keenan and the Keenan Team

http://neilkeenan.com/neil-keenan-update-karen-hudes-what-the-flack/

 
 
This could be considered an update, but it’s a little different than usual. I noticed a post that had gone up on my site, from what I understand quite by accident, stating that Karen Hudes is a cabal shill. It was not written or approved by me. It was a draft written by a team member which was mistakenly posted before it was reviewed and approved by myself, which is required for all posts on my site. The post itself most likely would have never have reached you. But it did. It was only up for a few minutes and it went viral! Ms. Hudes responded to it saying that there was no proof of her being a cabal shill but that she has taken a lot of flack from me. It is her use of the word “flack” that I disagree with.

When I heard I was giving her flack, I thought immediately of Roberta Flack, but upon reading her response to the inadvertent post of this draft, I understood that this flack had nothing to do with Roberta. In fact, Ms. Hudes has been a fraud and con from the moment she left the World Bank. Some call this being a shill, others label it something else. Whatever the label, the irrefutable fact about Ms. Hudes is that she is a disgrace to this planet and its people.

Now let me explain the “flack” that Ms. Hudes has taken from me, because it needs to be understood for what it really was – rage. Being who and what she is, I do not believe that Ms. Hudes has any right to criticize anyone. She has gone after so many good people that one loses count. She claims to be a whistleblower, however, from the very beginning this woman has come to us with deceit in her black heart.

Ah, but do not take this Irish man the wrong way. I am far from perfect, but I do give to you what I get because I believe in my heart that all of you have a right to know what is really happening in the world to which I have access. Following the wrong person hurts us all. Anyone buying into the disinformation and outright lies of Ms. Hudes will find themselves in a state of perpetual confusion.

Soon after being fired by the World Bank, Karen “the-bouncing-ball” Hudes was claiming there was no gold in Asia, which was in complete contradiction to her earlier claims that the Dragon Family owned eighty percent or more of the World Bank assets. Furthermore, she stated that she never worked with me when, in fact, not only did she request my assistance with the Dragon Family, I also introduced her to some of my associates, including Count Albert. Having been barred from entry by World Bank security after her dismissal, the Dragon Family was going to get those doors reopened for her. Instead, she brazenly went behind my back with the Family and attempted to cut me out. After that, the Dragon Family would have nothing to do with Karen Hudes, and the World Bank doors remain barred to her.

Ms. Hudes could not even contain herself at the outset of our acquaintance, quickly devolving a conversation with Jean Haines into a one-way screaming match, where Ms. Hudes attempted to intimidate and bully Jean until I intervened to put a stop to this perplexing personal abuse. Hearing Karen become completely unhinged for no reason lead me to the conclusion that she was not someone with whom we could continue to be involved. There were other clues too. Karen claims that Ferdinand Marcos was M1, the controller and signatory for the Global Account assets; and that he had the authority to designate Global Account signatories and controllers of Global Account assets after his death. Ferdinand Marcos was President of the Philippines and died in 1989. The West designated him M1 during his lifetime. He was not elected by the stakeholder nations. And he certainly never had authority to designate signatories and controllers upon his death. Indonesian President Sukarno was the only duly elected M1.

Among the many arenas that Ms. Hudes has strayed into was the global reset. How could she discuss a global reset excluding the Dragon Family when she herself stated that eighty percent of the Global Account assets were Dragon Family deposits, including those of the World Bank? The deposits have been stolen and used by the West for more than 100 years. The Bretton Woods Agreement in 1944 was an outright theft that landed us in the position we are in today. But the tide has changed, and as I stated more than two years ago, the East needs to create their own financial system and rid themselves of the Zionist/Nazi/Khazarian bastards who have usurped power from the Western peoples.

In an interview with Kerry Cassidy on August 2, 2013, Bix Weir, a business blogger, states “all debts will be forgiven.” Sure, Bix, the West steals and walks away after so much damage not only to the East but also to mankind. Did you ask the depositors of the Global Assets if they would forgive the West? Of course not — business as usual! In Bix’s interview Hudes states, “I recommend that we need a currency that is backed by precious metals or some other valuable commodity.” Where has Karen been, in a bunker? Global Accounts’ gold has backed most currencies on the face of this planet for more than 70 years, albeit through much theft and the misappropriated collateral use by the West.

In a Karen Hudes’ update of October 3, 2013, she claims that the Monaco Accords of August, 2011, was nothing but a money grab to gain control over Global Account gold. Since I was there, I can state that this meeting had nothing to do with gold and everything to do with the East severing financial ties with the West. No one from the West was invited to this meeting because the sole purpose was to discuss plans for leaving the West on its own and the evolution of a new financial system for the East. The Eastern financial system is evolving now with the building of their own new “IMF.” How could this meeting conceivably be a power grab when the funds were stolen from the East and they wanted their assets unmolested NOW?

Ben Fulford was courting a half million dollars in fees from third parties for an interview with Hudes, a clever ploy that received a great deal of publicity. When questioning Hudes, Fulford feigned ignorance about the 2011 Monaco Accords to draw her out into a trap set by her own deceit. She admitted that she was only repeating hearsay about the Monaco Accords’ agenda. Apparently she thinks nothing of representing hearsay as fact, while I was there (eyewitness Jean Paul’s comment of 9/23/13 @ 7:38 a.m.) and my information is direct, confirmed by the stakeholders of the Global Accounts themselves and corroborated by other leaders in power and in the know.

No gold in Asia? No gold in Indonesia? No, Karen, there are enormous stockpiles of gold there. It was there when you said it didn’t exist, and it remained there after you claimed to have “found it” in China. This is precisely what John Kerry was after during all of his visits there. When he was told “no” by the Indonesian President, Kerry then made the statement that the US has new technological weather devices that could put Jakarta underwater in minutes. This threat and public confirmation of HAARP was not meant just for Indonesia, but was a threat to the entire world. Hudes then pivoted her assertion stating it is the Vatican that is holding on to the gold, not Asia.

Prior to our post on the German Government’s demand of the US to return 300 metric tonnes of “their” gold, Ms. Hudes joined the Germans in clamoring for its return. After our post Karen hopped on our bandwagon, pivoting her position yet again, and agreeing that the German Government has no standing to demand gold in US possession after their colossal gold theft leading up to WWII.

The East entrusted the West twice to do the right thing with the Global Accounts, and the West failed. Now the cat is out of the bag. There is no way the Zionists will continue with their control — it is over with. The Bretton Woods Agreement has long since been exposed and will not be renewed. The fact is that with its own financial system being put in place, the East will use what belongs to them to strengthen their nations. Do not get me wrong here — they will give funds directly to established foundations to assist the West. These funds will not go into the hands of the cabal or their puppet politicians again. The glory days of the Zionist are over. We have had a century of fraud, robbery, and bloodshed as their bequest to the world, and now it subsides. The American People and the people of the West are welcome to place their funds in the Bank of China, (I believe there are branches in New York and Los Angeles where deposits are held in yuan and debit cards are available for daily needs) seeing that the US dollar possibly might not survive the Zionists’ greed and recklessness. This option might be a way out for individuals, as well protecting assets through physical gold and silver holdings.

Finally, Karen Hudes has recently been talking about aliens, and Peru and the Parallel or Nazca Lines. This is something I know about but it is no new discovery. Let’s digress a bit. If you are not familiar with the Ica Desert in Peru, you’ll find that there is a trident etched into the desert pointing the way to the Nazca Lines. It cannot be seen on the ground but only from the sky.

Peru has many mysterious sites, one of which is Machu Picchu, a city built with large stones and located high in the jungle mountains. Briefly, the stones that were used weigh two tons or more and fit together precisely with absolutely no space between them. Imagine moving two-ton rocks 15,000 feet high into the mountains. This was the home of the Incas, with the city of Cusco nearby. (“Cusco” means belly button in the Incan Empire). How did they ever build such a city as Machu Picchu? Men with llamas? No way!

Long before Karen Hudes appeared on the scene, the actress Shirley MacLaine brought much attention to Peru and its mystical sites. She claimed they were visited by aliens. The inside of some Incan tombs substantiate flying objects in the skies with strange beings on the ground. A search on the internet will provide much information on these sites. So now Karen Hudes has announced the discovery of a second species on the planet “distinct from homo sapiens” who are hiding in the Vatican. I leave it to the reader what to make of this.

Add to this that Karen had earlier embarrassed herself with preposterous conclusions that the comet ISON was actually the planet Nibiru and was going to cause electromagnetic catastrophes on Earth, and that the Chinese army was going to enforce Obama’s martial law on American soil back in the spring of 2013. Please, Karen. Get a hold of yourself!

The glaring question here is why this former World Bank lawyer would claim to be a whistleblower who wants to help free humanity? She has put out misinformation on everything from the Global Accounts, to world finance, to gold being returned to people who don’t own it, and has attacked both the Vatican and anti-Vatican activists, as well as sincere human liberty activists everywhere. And now aliens? She openly admits to repeating hearsay, switches positions on her assertions and has the audacity to slander what other sincere people are doing for humanity. For those who are interested, there are many factual exposés on the internet about her background and associations, the World Bank work of her husband, Barry Spergel, and their ties to the Rothschilds, all of which make it clear that she does not have humanity’s best interests at heart, such as here, and here, and here, and here.

Some have suggested that Hudes is the victim of MK Ultra mind control. This would certainly explain her schizophrenic statements, obnoxious behavior and her true situation. If this is the case, she is to be pitied but hardly excused from what she’s doing. Blowing the whistle on her handlers and cease speaking to the public can be the only humanitarian things for her to do now.

The bottom line is that Karen Hudes is nobody. If there are those who choose to see her as a brave whistleblower out to save humanity, then they are falling into an obvious trap. I have not heard from her in some time and I consider that a blessing. As you will surmise from what I have said here, I have not given her any flack. What I did have for her is rage: rage for her engaging in a campaign to deliberately mislead people while posing as a humanitarian whistleblower, rage that she would dare to criticize and slander other good people in our liberty community while posturing herself with self-righteous importance and credibility simply because she is a lawyer, rage with her deceit, lies and complete lack of morality.

But after going over the entire list of Karen Hudes’ shenanigans, I’ve now decided that I no longer even feel the rage. I have forgiven her because she is a …



00:00
00:00



This will be my last time addressing the notorious Ms. Hudes, one of Zionist’s own – but surely not one of its brightest.

Now let me give you a quick insight as to what is happening in the world today with the information I have. The Asian and Russian nations are now being joined by the Caribbean nations who have reached out and requested that they also be allowed to join the NO FLY ZONE accords. Is it possible we can box the bad guys into one place with nowhere to hide?

Bear in mind that this has nothing to do with you, but with them. It will assist anyone who would need to enter the US to track them down. But I have to make sure it does not hurt any of you, as in the case of your being on a flight along with blacklisted individuals, which now number over 600. As for the NO FLY ZONE accord itself, it is still being worked out with the various parties that are joining it, or will be impacted by it. This is not as simple as one would think, but once completed it will have an immense global effect. I am working hard to see that everything I do is timely.

Thanks go to all of you for your support.

Copyright © 2014, GROUP K, Ltd.

.

http://neilkeenan.com/neil-keenan-update-karen-hudes-what-the-flack/
 
 
 

Orwellian Secret Courts in the UK : Britain on the Brink of Tyranny

  the tap
Britain is on the brink of tyranny. The Justice and Security Bill, if it becomes law, will enable judicial trials to be held in secret, and it will even be illegal to tell anyone about them. The bill has now gone through all stages in the House of Commons, and will now go to the House of Lords for consideration. In other words, it’s nearly there .(http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/justiceandsecurity.html).
The bill’s sponsor in the Commons is Justice Minister Kenneth Clarke, who is widely believed to be on the steering committee of the highly secretive Bilderberg meetings. In a foreward to a consultation document, he explains that the purpose of the bill is to enable the government to defend itself against civil claims, with claimants typically seeking significant amounts in damages, but where the facts of the case turn on highly sensitive information (http://consultation.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/justiceandsecurity/).
 
 KENNETH CLARKE
But it seems that’s just the gloss. Richard Cottrell, in his book ‘Gladio: NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe’ (http://progressivepress.com/book-listing/gladio-natos-dagger-heart-europe) wrote a lot about this bill. At the time it had been rejected, but he rightly predicted that it would return. He wrote to me: “The Justice and Security Bill has been around for some years, since 7/7 hardly by co-incidence. It proposes that secret courts will inquire into any matters concerning individuals or events that the authorities decide they want to keep secret. This will apply in the case of the as yet unheld inquests on those blamed for 7/7.
“It was also to apply to living accused persons who would be denied under this Orwellian draft the right to represent themselves or have their own lawyers represent them. Nor will they be allowed to know what they are accused of. In the Soviet Union this was perfectly normal. In the place of legal representation the state will appoint Special Advocates who will not be under any responsibility to represent the accused, or explain to that person of what he is accused, and nor will they be under any responsibility to offer a defence.
“The Bill was savaged by the Lords, but returned to the Commons with all the Lords’ amendments struck out. On the day of the vote on gay marriages it slipped through the vote in the select committee with the vote of one backwoods Ulsterman rushed in at the last minute. (The vote was held at the same [time] as members were in the lobbies voting on the gay marriage Bill). … This law when passed, as it will be, can then be applied to all and any offence, even as lowly as a traffic accident. Accused persons will never be told of what they are charged and of course it is very unlikely they would be found ‘not guilty.’”
The British press is now very quiet on this, though the Daily Mail published an article on 10 February headed ‘Last week MPs revived the corpse of the ‘Secret Justice’ Bill. Here we spell out the full terrifying implications of life in… Secret Britain’ (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2276327/Last-week-MPs-revived-corpse-Secret-Justice-Bill–debating-gay-marriage-time-noticed-Here-spell-terrifying-implications-life–Secret-Britain.html). Interestingly, their sister paper, The Mail on Sunday, is about to take legal action to make public a secret judgement issued in an Afghan alleged torture case two years ago, which resulted from an earlier form of secret hearing, now deemed illegal by the Supreme Court (http://www.leighday.co.uk/News/2013/January-2013/Secret-evidence-challenge-by-Mail-on-Sunday). Also, political campaigner Chris Mullin gave a warning in The Guardian website on 28 January, headed ‘Justice and security bill: last chance to back away from secret justice’ (http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/jan/28/justice-security-last-chance-secret-evidence).
And now Big Brother Watch has launched a campaign, asking people to write to their MP (http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/home/2013/03/write-to-your-mp-about-the-justice-and-security-bill-today.html). Someone commented “What’s the point?”. OK, write to your local newspaper then.
 
Whistleblowers gagged – and there’s worse to come
Another piece of legislation which could make it difficult to expose possible government crimes is a proposed amendment to the  1984 Police and Criminal Evidence Act, as proposed by the Leveson Inquiry into phone hacking. This would make it easier for the police to seize confidential material from journalists, and it would weaken protection for whistleblowers (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/feb/13/whistleblowers-press-new-police-powers). A leading barrister warned of a potential breach of European human rights law, the article states. But now the Government intends to do away with European human rights law (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/04/theresa-may-human-rights-stunt). It looks as if the question of UK membership of the EU is being used as cover for this.
An editorial in The Guardian four days later drew attention to the general vulnerability of whistleblowers, as in the case of a former chief executive in the National Health Service, Gary Walker, who had been told that he would have to pay back any compensation payment arising from his dismissal if he spoke out (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/feb/17/journalistic-sources-law-editorial). But the problem was bigger than that. ‘NHS spends £15million (the same as 750 nurses’ salaries) on gagging 600 whistleblowers’ announced the Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2282600/NHS-spends-15million-750-nurses-salaries-gagging-600-whistleblowers.html), saying that this had cost the lives of 1 200 patients. The new legislation will make it even more difficult to blow the whistle, even when many lives are at stake.
“Democracy cannot work when secrecy exceeds its proper limits”, states the Guardian editorial, adding that hospitals, banks, corporations, meat producers and police forces alike must be open to scrutiny. I would add even humble membership associations to that list; that is something we can all do something about. Whenever we are met with indignation, having asked such basic questions as “Have these accounts been audited?”, “What is the basis of your proposal?”, or “How much money do we have?”, or in trying to raise perfectly legisimate issues, we need to stand up to such negative reactions. You’re standing up not just for your cause, but for your just cause of democracy.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/orwellian-secret-courts-in-the-

uk-britain-on-the-brink-of-tyranny/5325994

Gordon




7 May 2014

BRITAIN BRINGS BACK SLAVERY : Crimes against Humanity and Manslaughter

 

Keith Ordinary Guy reporting 

Iain Duncan Smith to police

SONIA POULTON

Author and social activist, Keith Lindsay-Cameron, aka Keith Ordinary Guy, is most known for his 'Letter A Day To No. 10'. Here he attempts to report Government Minister Iain Duncan Smith to police for a number of crimes against humanity.

 

 

 

 

ADORING PUBLIC'S ''A LIST'' PEDO STARS FEAR MAX CLIFFORD

PR Agent, Max Clifford arriving for his sentence at Southwark Crown Court


Max Clifford wrote to previous clients during his sex abuse trial asking for money.
The disclosure will alarm rich and famous figures whose scandals the publicity agent boasted he had covered up.
‘Max Clifford wrote to previous clients during his sex abuse trial asking for money.
The disclosure will alarm rich and famous figures whose scandals the publicity agent boasted he had covered up.
The 71-year-old, jailed for eight years after being found guilty of indecent assaults against girls and young women, is said to be upset that clients have deserted him.’

Read more …

BREAKING NEWS : Brothers of "Pedophile" Belgian Prime Minister named in counterfeit ring

BRUSSELS - Prime Minister Elio Di Rupo of Belgium, first openly gay man to lead a sovereign state, and the first openly gay man to win the position in his own right pursuant to an election, has two of his brothers are under investigation for being involved in a counterfeit printing affair with the Italian mafia.

Machines were discovered in his brother's hanger for printing counterfeit money. The Prime Minister's brother's counterfeit printing business was so flourishing that he went to Germany for technicians for his counterfeiting machines.

Earlier this year, Prime Minister Elio Di Rupo was called a "pedophile" on the floor of the Belgian Parliament by MP Laurent Louis. MP Louis had published a list of prominent pedophiles in Belgium, including members of Parliament, members of the Monarchy, lawyers, bankers, and others.


 NEWS ARTICLE ON COUNTERFEIT RING:

http://www.levif.be/info/actualite/belgique/deux-freres-di-rupo-mis-en-cause-devant-le-tribunal/article-4000108267570.htm

PM Elio Di Rupo: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elio_Di_Rupo





Martial Law Concentration Camps and Kangaroo Courts. America about to become The Third Reich

the tap 





Martial Law, Detention Camps and Kangaroo Courts: Are We Recreating the Third Reich?
By John W. Whitehead


“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”—Martin Niemoller

May 06 2014 "ICH" - Despite what some may think, the Constitution is no magical incantation against government wrongdoing. Indeed, it’s only as effective as those who abide by it. However, without courts willing to uphold the Constitution’s provisions when government officials disregard it and a citizenry knowledgeable enough to be outraged when those provisions are undermined, it provides little to no protection against SWAT team raids, domestic surveillance, police shootings of unarmed citizens, indefinite detentions, and the like.

Unfortunately, the courts and the police have meshed in their thinking to such an extent that anything goes when it’s done in the name of national security, crime fighting and terrorism. Consequently, America no longer operates under a system of justice characterized by due process, an assumption of innocence, probable cause and clear prohibitions on government overreach and police abuse. Instead, our courts of justice have been transformed into courts of order, advocating for the government’s interests, rather than championing the rights of the citizenry, as enshrined in the Constitution.

Just recently, for example, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in U.S. v. Westhoven that driving too carefully, with a rigid posture, taking a scenic route, and having acne are sufficient reasons for a police officer to suspect you of doing something illegal, detain you, search your car, and arrest you—even if you’ve done nothing illegal to warrant the stop in the first place.

In that same vein, the U.S. Supreme Court declared in a 5-4 ruling in Navarette v. California that police officers can, under the guise of “reasonable suspicion,” stop cars and question drivers based solely on anonymous tips, no matter how dubious, and whether or not they themselves witnessed any troubling behaviour.

And then you have the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Hedges v. Obama, a legal challenge to the indefinite detention provision of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA), thereby affirming that the President and the U.S. military can arrest and indefinitely detain individuals, including American citizens, based on a suspicion that they might be associated with or aiding terrorist organisations.

All three cases reflect a mindset in which the rule of law, the U.S. Constitution, once the map by which we navigated sometimes hostile terrain, has been unceremoniously booted out of the runaway car that is our government, driven over and left for road kill on the side of the road. All that can be seen in the rear view mirror are the tire marks on its ragged frame.

What we are dealing with, as I document in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, is a run-away government hyped up on its own power, whose policies are dictated more by paranoia than need. Making matters worse, “we the people” have become so gullible, so easily distracted, and so out-of-touch that we are ignoring the warning signs all around us and failing to demand that government officials of all stripes—the White House, Congress, the courts, the military, law enforcement, the endless parade of bureaucrats, etc.—respect our rights and abide by the rule of law.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the NDAA indefinite detention case—which challenged whether the government can lawfully lock up American citizens who might be deemed extremists or terrorists (the government likes to use these words interchangeably) for criticizing the government—is one such warning sign that we would do well to heed.

The building blocks are already in place for such an eventuality: the surveillance networks, fusion centers and government contractors already monitor what is being said by whom; government databases track who poses a potential threat to the government’s power; the militarized police, working in conjunction with federal agencies, coordinate with the federal government when it’s time to round up the troublemakers; the courts sanction the government’s methods, no matter how unlawful; and the detention facilities, whether private prisons or FEMA internment camps, to lock up the troublemakers.

For those who can read the writing on the wall, it’s all starting to make sense: the military drills carried out in major American cities, the VIPR inspections at train depots and bus stations, the SWAT team raids on unsuspecting homeowners, the Black Hawk helicopters patrolling American skies, the massive ammunition purchases by various federal agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Education, the IRS and the Social Security Administration.

Viewed in conjunction with the government’s increasing use of involuntary commitment laws to declare individuals mentally ill and lock them up in psychiatric wards for extended periods of time, the NDAA’s provision allowing the military to arrest and indefinitely detain anyone, including American citizens, only codifies this unraveling of our constitutional framework.

Throw in the profit-driven corporate incentive to jail Americans in private prisons, as well as the criminalizing of such relatively innocent activities as holding Bible studies in one’s home or sharing unpasteurized goat cheese with members of one’s community, and it becomes clear that “we the people” have become enemies of the state. Thus, it’s no longer a question of whether the government will lock up Americans for First Amendment activity but when. (It’s particularly telling that the government’s lawyers, when pressed for an assurance that those exercising their First Amendment rights in order to criticize the government would not be targeted under the NDAA, refused to provide one.)

History shows that the U.S. government is not averse to locking up its own citizens for its own purposes. One need only go back to the 1940s, when the federal government proclaimed that Japanese-Americans, labeled potential dissidents, could be put in concentration (a.k.a. internment) camps based only upon their ethnic origin, to see the lengths the federal government will go to in order to maintain “order” in the homeland. The U.S. Supreme Court validated the detention program in Korematsu v. US (1944), concluding that the government’s need to ensure the safety of the country trumped personal liberties. That decision has never been overturned.

In fact, the creation of detention camps domestically has long been part of the government’s budget and operations, falling under the jurisdiction of FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA’s murky history dates back to the 1970s, when President Carter created it by way of an executive order merging many of the government’s disaster relief agencies into one large agency. During the 1980s, however, reports began to surface of secret military-type training exercises carried out by FEMA and the Department of Defense. Code named Rex-84, 34 federal agencies, including the CIA and the Secret Service, were trained on how to deal with domestic civil unrest.

FEMA’s role in creating top-secret American internment camps is well-documented. But be careful who you share this information with: it turns out that voicing concerns about the existence of FEMA detention camps is among the growing list of opinions and activities which may make a federal agent or government official think you’re an extremist (a.k.a. terrorist), or sympathetic to terrorist activities, and thus qualify you for indefinite detention under the NDAA. Also included in that list of “dangerous” viewpoints are advocating states’ rights, believing the state to be unnecessary or undesirable, “conspiracy theorizing,” concern about alleged FEMA camps, opposition to war, organizing for “economic justice,” frustration with “mainstream ideologies,” opposition to abortion, opposition to globalization, and ammunition stockpiling.

Now if you’re going to have internment camps on American soil, someone has to build them. Thus, in 2006, it was announced that Kellogg Brown and Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton, had been awarded a $385 million contract to build American detention facilities. Although the government and Halliburton were not forthcoming about where or when these domestic detention centers would be built, they rationalized the need for them in case of “an emergency influx of immigrants, or to support the rapid development of new programs” in the event of other emergencies such as “natural disasters.”

Of course, these detention camps will have to be used for anyone viewed as a threat to the government, and that includes political dissidents. So it’s no coincidence that the U.S. government has, since the 1980s, acquired and maintained, without warrant or court order, a database of names and information on Americans considered to be threats to the nation. As Salon reports, this database, reportedly dubbed “Main Core,” is to be used by the Army and FEMA in times of national emergency or under martial law to locate and round up Americans seen as threats to national security. As of 2008, there were some 8 million Americans in the Main Core database.

Fast forward to 2009, when the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released two reports, one on “Rightwing Extremism,” which broadly defines rightwing extremists as individuals and groups “that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely,” and one on “Leftwing Extremism,” which labeled environmental and animal rights activist groups as extremists. Both reports use the words terrorist and extremist interchangeably. That same year, the DHS launched Operation Vigilant Eagle, which calls for surveillance of military veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, characterizing them as extremists and potential domestic terrorist threats because they may be “disgruntled, disillusioned or suffering from the psychological effects of war.”

These reports indicate that for the government, so-called extremism is not a partisan matter. Anyone seen as opposing the government—whether they’re Left, Right or somewhere in between—is a target, which brings us back, full circle, to where we started, with the NDAA’s indefinite detention provision, whose language is so broad and vague as to implicate anyone critical of the government.

Unfortunately, we seem to be coming full circle on many fronts. Consider that a decade ago we were debating whether non-citizens—for example, so-called enemy combatants being held at Guantanamo Bay and Muslim-Americans rounded up in the wake of 9/11—were entitled to protections under the Constitution, specifically as they relate to indefinite detention. Americans weren’t overly concerned about the rights of non-citizens then, and now we’re the ones in the unenviable position of being targeted for indefinite detention by our own government.

Similarly, most Americans weren’t unduly concerned when the U.S. Supreme Court gave Arizona police officers the green light to stop, search and question anyone—ostensibly those fitting a particular racial profile—they suspect might be an illegal immigrant. Two years later, the cops have carte blanche authority to stop any individual, citizen and non-citizen alike, they suspect might be doing something illegal (mind you, in this age of overcriminalization, that could be anything from feeding the birds to growing exotic orchids).

Likewise, you still have a sizeable portion of the population today unconcerned about the government’s practice of spying on Americans, having been brainwashed into believing that if you’re not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about. It will only be a matter of time before they learn the hard way that in a police state, it doesn’t matter who you are or how righteous you claim to be—eventually, you will be lumped in with everyone else and everything you do will be “wrong” and suspect.

Martin Niemoller learned that particular lesson the hard way. A German military officer turned theologian, Niemoller was an early supporter of Hitler’s rise to power. It was only when Hitler threatened to attack the churches that Niemoller openly opposed the regime. For his efforts, Neimoller was arrested, charged with activities against the government, fined, detained, and eventually interned in the Sachsenhausen and Dachau concentration camps from 1938 to 1945.

As Niemoller reportedly replied when asked by his cellmate why he ever supported the Nazi party:

I find myself wondering about that too. I wonder about it as much as I regret it. Still, it is true that Hitler betrayed me… Hitler promised me on his word of honor, to protect the Church, and not to issue any anti-Church laws. He also agreed not to allow pogroms against the Jews… Hitler's assurance satisfied me at the time…I am paying for that mistake now; and not me alone, but thousands of other persons like me.

John W. Whitehead is an attorney and author who has written, debated and practiced widely in the area of constitutional law and human rights. Whitehead's concern for the persecuted and oppressed led him, in 1982, to establish The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties and human rights organization whose international headquarters are located in Charlottesville, Virginia.https://www.rutherford.org/

Copyright 2014 © The Rutherford Institute http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article38428.htm



6 May 2014

UK Column News - 6th May 2014 : TEN COMMANDMENTS OF THE NWO PSYCHOPATH

http://tannhauserxxx.wix.com/sign-of-the-times-uk


 

http://www.ukcolumn.org/


TEN COMMANDMENTS OF THE NWO PSYCHOPATH


Louise Collins and Brian Gerrish are joined by Mark Anderson from American Free Press for today's UK Column news update.


Max Clifford knows where the bodies are buried : Queen BBC and The Royal Child Catcher To The Establishment

the tap 

Max Clifford arrested. What does he know they want hidden?

 

 The Rolling Stones and Led Zeppelin?

Their history of sexual antics with underage girls is well known and documented. They even sing about it in some of their songs

 

The Queen,The BBC & The Royal Child Catcher To The Establishment

 




READ MORE HERE





BANKING SYSTEM OF HUMAN USURY = Austerity Suicides



Today, austerity and suicide go hand in hand in Greece. One study directly links most suicides in 2009 and 2010 to the budget cuts, saying over five hundred Greek men have taken their lives in this period. That's an average of almost one person per day. The country used to have the lowest rate in Europe - but that number spiraled when the economy crashed. Marina Kosareva spoke to some of those who've been driven close to the edge.