31 Mar 2012

BRITISH ROYAL SURROGATE MOTHERS





Queen Mother’s real mother was her family’s French cook ... the domestic help was ‘an early version of surrogacy’ for both Elizabeth Bowes Lyon and her younger brother David.

The cook, an ‘attractive and pleasant Frenchwoman’ called Marguerite Rodiere, gave birth to the future Queen Elizabeth because her own mother Cecilia, who already had eight children, was unable to have any more.




This explains the unflattering nickname ‘Cookie’ given to the 
Queen Mother by the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.




Elizabeth Bowes Lyon at the age of seven.


The Queen Mother's exact date of birth in August 1900 as the fourth daughter of Lord Glamis, later 14th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, has always been disputed

It also remained unclear whether she was actually born in the back of a London ambulance or the family home, St Paul’s Waldenbury, in Hertfordshire.


Another puzzle has been why the Queen Mother, born the Honourable Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes Lyon, was given a French middle name
The Queen Mother was the daughter of a Welsh maid who worked in the family’s castle in Scotland.




Elizabeth with her brother in 1915.

Another puzzle has been why the Queen Mother, born the Honourable Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes Lyon, was given a French middle name.

Royal and aristocratic circles had been alight for decades with the story that Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, while undoubtedly the daughter of the 14th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, was not the child of his wife Cecilia, nor was her younger brother David, born nearly two years after her on 2nd May, 1902.

‘The two Benjamins, as they were known in the Bowes Lyon family (in a Biblical allusion to the brother of Joseph, who was himself the product of a coupling between his father and his mother’s maid) were supposedly the children of Marguerite Rodiere, an attractive and pleasant Frenchwoman who had been the cook at St Paul’s Waldenbury and is meant to have provided Lord and Lady Glamis with the two children they so yearned for after Cecilia was forbidden by her doctors from producing any more progeny.

‘Hence the nickname of Cookie, which the Duke and Duchess of Windsor took care to promulgate throughout international society once Elizabeth proved herself to be their most formidable enemy.’

Some people did know the truth surrounding the Queen Mother’s birth, chiefly her brother-in-law, David.

As King Edward VIII, David had access to all the information about Elizabeth’s secret which was not so secret in aristocratic and royal circles.

‘When he discovered, to his horror, that Elizabeth was actively scheming with his own courtiers to undermine his position as king and prevent him from marrying the woman he loved, he used the wealth of access at his disposal to circumvent his own private and deputy private secretaries and obtain sight of the documents, which confirmed that Elizabeth had been born, not of 4th August as supposed, but on 3rd August at St Paul’s Waldenbury to Marguerite Rodiere.’

‘The Duke of Windsor always maintained that he would never have revealed Elizabeth’s secret had he not discovered at the time of the Abdication Crisis, through Lord Beaverbrook, that Elizabeth was behind the rumour that Wallis (Simpson) had learnt secret sexual techniques in a bordello in China, and it was this which was the secret hold she had over King Edward VIII.

Once he knew this to be true, however, he felt justified in rumbling the sister-in-law who had a secret of her own, and one, moreover, which had in his view, more merit than the one she said about his beloved.’

That’s why thereafter, Elizabeth was known as Cookie.

For those who asked, why she was being called by that nickname, there was always a member of the Windsor circle willing and able to recount how the High and Mighty Princess Elizabeth, Queen of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, Empress of India, Queen of Canada, Australia, etc,etc, was not even legitimate, but the daughter of the 13th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne and St Paul’s Waldenbury cook,Mademoiselle Marguerite Rodiere.


Surrogacy and the upper classes


It was not unusual for the upper classes to use ‘surrogacy’ arrangements to create

large families.

In the days before antibiotics, child mortality rates were high and sole male heirs stood a good chance of being killed in a war.

It was important that aristocrats left a ‘spare heir or two’, and sometimes enlisted the aid of their domestic staff.

‘The grander the couple, the more likely that there was a serious problem, for great estates were entailed upon the title, meaning that a peer could not leave his property to whom he pleased.

‘The aristocracy was filled with horror stories about widows and daughters of great peers living in penury while some distant cousin was lording it over them.’

George VI allegedly took offence to the growing friendship between the young Princess Elizabeth and ‘Little Porchy’, who later became Lord Carnarvon.

The King is alleged to have said: ‘Young Porchester is charming, but there is no possibility of my condoning a union between a daughter of mine and a butler’s son.’



8 comments:

  1. I don't have any words to appreciate this post.....I am really impressed ....the person who created this post surely knew the subject well..thanks for sharing this with us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is something I would expect to see in the Enquirer or the Star? Why would I care whether or not the Royal Family or anyone else has a Surrogate Mother?? You call yourself spiritual people?? This is smut and all that's going on in the world and you print something like this? You should be ashamed of yourselves, so why aren't you. This type of consciousness would never be a part of the New World, never.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Perhaps the poster on July 25th 2013 cannot see the connection between all the lies and huge hoaxes perpetuated on the public? ~~~~~ What about this latest one then? The Royal Baby Scam? by 2012thebigpicture (Search the info) If you dare! You see, those at the top are the reason all of us are at the bottom and treated as such! Open those eyes and see it all as it really is! There are no rose-coloured specs when the truth is discovered!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I forgot to confirm which anonymous poster I referred to. It was the July 25th poster at 03:15 ~~~~~ I might as well add that truth it truth, and not 'smut.' This is journalism of the honest type, bringing out into the open that which should not have been hidden. If we all believe lies, there is no emotional security in our lives.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous at 03:15 is none other than an internet troll hired to stir it up by adding their "smut" to the pot. Unfortunately for them, their smut meatballs are by now so easily recognized that they can be picked out, ignored and/or trashed when appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am not surprised at the content of this article. I also do not believe that Miss Kate Middleton (I refuse to call her a duchess) was pregnant or had morning sickness or whatever. No one questioned the pregnancies of the other crown princesses of Europe, but they sure questioned hers right off the bat, especially after Jacintha Saldanha most likely found out about Kate's egg-harvesting and the surrogate, she was murdered for that. These people are top-level evil Illuminati scum. The only thing the BRF needs Kate for is as a token wife for Bill, to look "pretty", and to pretend to be pregnant.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Honestly, from a mother's point of view. I have two kids. and while some mother's have NO problem bouncing back (I am still working in it lol), Kate, looks like, she never had any kids. Nor does she breast feed. Not that is any of our businesses. .but...
    bottom line is, and what a lot of people are questioning, is that she was maybe never preggers in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kate did not give birth to the future king. That whole show with stomach was poorly made. A shame on them.
    She is not the right blood and her genetic pool already out of business by eating genetically modified foods for the past 15 years (they are on the market that long)
    Go and search people about lab hamsters and mice experiment. After GMO soy powder feeding –second generation came out crippled and the third they couldn’t even get. It works the same way on humans. That baby you all have seen, came from very special clean genetic pool woman and the right blue blood of course (RH-).

    ReplyDelete