30 Nov 2013

Karen Hudes commented on "Pope Francis denounces ‘trickle-down’ economic theories in critique of inequality"

 



Pope Francis denounces ‘trickle-down’ economic theories The pope sharply criticized growing economic inequality and unfettered markets in a lengthy paper.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/pope-francis-denounces-trickle-down-economic-theories-in-critique-of-inequality/2013/11/26/e17ffe4e-56b6-11e3-8304-caf30787c0a9_story.html


Pope Francis’s viral quotes on wealth, abortion, atheists, war and gay Catholics:  Here are some of the pontiff’s most widely shared quotes, including his latest. “...Trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world ... has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power...Meanwhile, the excluded are still waiting.”

KAREN HUDES' COMMENT

Karen_Hudes
5:19 PM GMT
I will believe Pope Francis when the Vatican returns the US tax revenues paid to the Vatican Bank via the Jesuit-controlled Federal Reserve. (See: StatutoryInstrument1997.html
http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/Britian-Po...
http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/WholeLotOfTreason.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcS4D41bymk&lis...
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=wm#inbox/142... irs in puerto rico)

When a Brit named Bennell in Australia contacted me Wednesday to ask my opinion on how to divide the world's gold, (see https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/fdod37.pdf ) this seemed to be a propitious development which I shared with the Department of Defense, the Council of Governors, the US Congress, state Attorneys General, county executives, and the NY Missions to the United Nations




THE PEOPLE'S VOICE : LENNY HARPER ON JIMMY SAVILE

 

 THE PEOPLE'S VOICE 
Online users can't have escaped the new Citizens Media outlet to hit the internet. The People's Voice launched only 4 days ago and is making an impact with its hard hitting, well researched, and professional journalism, something lacking in mainstream media, not only in Jersey, but globally.

The People's Voice, does what it says on the tin, and gives those who are voiceless an opportunity to tell the alternative to the mainstream media's version of "news" facts and evidence.

The People's Voice was naturally interested in, what has become known as "the worst cover up in history" or "Jersey's dirty secrets" and made contact with those best placed to comment on Jersey's so-called "Justice" System and inner workings of those in power on the Island.








 .
 .
 .
Last night a number of justice campaigners, truth seekers, and victims of Jersey's so-called "Justice" System were interviewed live on the Sonia Poulton show. To include former Senior Investigating Officer of Operation Rectangle (Jersey's Child Abuse Investigation) Lenny Harper.

Anyone who gets that close to royalty and prime ministers (as well as holding a high-profile position in the BBC for fifty years) is thorougly checked out by the security services (MI5, etc.). That's exactly the kind of thing they're there for - "protecting the realm" includes protecting the sovereign and his/her family from contact with serial child rapists!
And anyone knighted by The Queen (which Savile was, in 1990) is thoroughly vetted to minimise the chance that disreputable behaviour won't come to light and embarrass the British monarchy by association.

So what happened? How much investigation, how much vetting went on? Did the British security services simply suffer from decades of incompetence? How did Savile get so close to the Royal Family? Were they not warned about him? If not, why? And if they were, why did they not shun him? 


READ MORE HERE :

JUSTICE DENIED
http://google-law.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/savile-who-was-protecting-him-for.html


 

29 Nov 2013

Exposed ... Hidden Source Code in Obamacare Strips Your Privacy Away



THIS GUY FROM TEXAS ACTUALLY STANDS FOR THE PEOPLE!
WHILE SHREDDING THE WOMEN ON THE SUBJECT, HE EXPOSES THE CRIMINAL HIDDEN SOURCE CODE THAT TAKES YOUR PRIVACY AWAY! SHARE SHARE SHARE , BEFORE INFO LIKE THIS GETS WIPED!


Russell Brand: the Sun on Sunday lied about me





Not a big deal in the scheme of things, but it's still the 
same fecund bone-yard of gossip, poison and lies.

Have they learned nothing?

Rupert Murdoch with first issue of the sun on sunday
Rupert Murdoch with the first issue of the Sun on Sunday. 
Photograph: Arthur Edwards/AFP/Getty

The Sun on Sunday, which is of course the News of the World with a different hat on, lied about me last week.

In the general scheme of things, the crumbling economy, the savaged environment, the treacherous, inept, deceitful politicians that govern us, the corrupt corporations that exploit us, it might not seem like a big deal. That's because it isn't to anyone, except me or my girlfriend. The pain, disruption and distress, that the Sun inflicted by falsely claiming that I cheated on my girlfriend, in the context of such awesome corruption, is a pale liver-spot on the back of Murdoch's glabrous claw. Still though, it's a tiny part of the demon's dermatology and as such, connected to all the other pestilence. Here's how.

Storytelling is important, whether it's a ruddy and robust town crier or Homer (I mean the Greek one but the other one counts too). The manner in which we receive information can affect us as much as the information itself. There is a certain duty that comes with being the anointed purveyor of truth. Can we trust that our media is fulfilling that duty? Who do they really serve? Everyone knows papers like the Daily Mail and the Sun can't be trusted, we've come to accept their duplicity as part of their charm, and their defence, that it's only really celebrities and people that deserve intrusion who are affected, while superficially true in this case, is actually the biggest lie of them all.

We all remember the worst lies, the ones where the red tops are caught red-handed, like Hillsborough, where the Sun enthusiastically heaped more pain on the grieving people of Liverpool by claiming that innocent fans had pissed on police and rifled through the possessions of their dead fellows under the front-page headline "The Truth". We remember the disgust we shared on learning that the News of the World hacked into the voicemail of a missing child who turned out to have been murdered. We all know too that they were said to have hacked the phones of dead British soldiers, victims of 7/7 and murdered Sarah Payne's mum. These people are not celebrities, they are only known through grave misfortune and then through calculated desecration.





Do any of us really think that these transgressions would have been freely admitted if not unwittingly revealed? No we do not. I wonder then what abominations lie uncovered beneath the tit and glitter lacquered grime and scum they serve up daily? We will never know the true extent of their dishonesty. We are dealing with experts in propaganda who will stop at nothing to see their version of events prevail, and on the rare occasions when the truth emerges, like a hernia popping through gorged corpse, they apologise discreetly for their ignoble flatulence in a mouse-sized font for hippo-sized lies. They dispose of the truth as expertly as Pulp Fiction's "Wolf" disposed of Marvin's body, these wolves of pulp fiction.
  
Rupert Murdoch, an animatronic al-Qaida recruitment poster, in his private letter to Sun staff, after the News of the World was briefly closed for a makeover (not through remorse, or shame, no, because they couldn't sell advertising space and because he wanted to launch the Sun on Sunday anyway because it's cheaper to run one title than two – some guys get all the luck) referred consistently to his pride in the Sun as "a trusted news source". Trusted is the word he used, not trustworthy. We know the Sun is not trustworthy and so does he. He uses the word "trusted" deliberately. Hitler was trusted, it transpired he was not trustworthy. He also said of the arrested journalists, "everyone is innocent until proven guilty". Well, yes, that is the law of our country, not however a nicety often afforded to the victims of his titles, and here I refer not only to hacking but the vituperative portrayal of weak and vulnerable members of our society, relentlessly attacked by Murdoch's ink jackals. Immigrants, folk with non-straight sexual identities, anyone in fact living in the margins of the Sun's cleansed utopia.

How this stuff works can be quite subtle. I remember a few years ago they ran a front-page story headlined "Immigrants are eating the Queen's swans".

I chuckled at the gleeful vilification of the alleged perpetrators and the jingoistic reference to the swan's royal owner. More sinister though was the information not included; that if people are eating swans from a park, it's not an act of antisocial defiance, it's because they're bloody starving.

What is the implicit agenda of an institution that highlights this aspect of the narrative? It is significant too (cygnet-nificant? They love a pun) that adjacent to the copy they placed a photograph of some "eastern" looking men and beneath it, the caption "Asylum seekers, like these pictured, are eating the Queen's swans" – LIKE these pictured!! It wasn't actually the culprits, merely, the Sun supposed, asylum seekers "like" them.

The reason for this irresponsible approximation is that when we next see an "eastern" looking person out and about we will have a visceral, visual association with an act of antisocial barbarism. This is how the Sun wants us to see immigrants, through their lens of vindictive condemnation. They want us looking suspiciously and disdainfully in the direction of marginalised individuals; "chavs", "immigrants" and "gays," not in the direction of the institutions who actually damage our society – banks, corporations and the media.

They forever print tabloid tales of benefit cheats on the swindle, which is bad – I used to do it – but the reality that we lose £1bn a year on all benefit fraud combined, and £25bn on tax avoidance and evasion by big companies and the super rich is seldom reported. Why don't we read that story in the Sun? Perhaps it's because, as Rupert said in his private email, the Sun would "continue to fight for its beliefs". Of course, the Sun believes in an easy ride for big corporations – it is a big corporation, Newscorp is one of the biggest there is. Plus they get £35,000 per page for the corporate ads they carry for Tescos, Vodafone, British Gas, O2, corporations within the incestuous family of business, media and government that grow corpulent together. It is common slither from parliament to a position on the board of a big company, or to creep from a tabloid role into a position advising leaders of a sleazy government. All operate within the cosy, loophole-laden system that advances their feudal interests and penalises the rest of us, at a time of ardently imposed austerity.





More importantly these corporations, whether they're selling information or consumer goods, collude in a pervasive myth and toil to keep us uninformed on important matters such as the environment, economic inequality, and distracted by vapid celebrity claptrap. The Sun don't want an informed populace rejecting their bigoted dogma and daily objectification of women. Tescos don't want engaged and educated consumers recognising the damage that their corporate marauding does to communities, agriculture and local businesses. Their agenda is the same.

These organisations want us dumb and full of junk, in our bellies and our brains. The Sun boast on their website that they give advertisers unique access to their "market", that's you and your family, because as Murdoch says, they are trusted.

They gloat about their power "one in every seven quid spent on groceries in the UK is spent by a Sun reader". Actually they don't say quid, they say pounds. On the Sun's marketing site, where they address the people who really matter to them, their corporate partners, they eschew the colloquial jocundity, where stars romp in love-nests and drop tots, here the silvery nomenclature of commerce reigns, the Sun's true tongue.

Should we all boycott the Sun as the people of Liverpool devoutly do to this day? Are other newspapers any better? We all enjoy a bit of gossip, it's hard to look away from kiss'n'tells or tittle-tattle whether it's about a doped-up soap star or Murdoch himself. I admit I read the story about his wife Wendi and Tony Blair in the Mail on Sunday last weekend and how they slept in the same house on numerous occasions, without ol' Digger knowing.

There's no way we would be reading such a tale, even in its anodyne, sanitised form, without a tacit nod from Aussie-Skeletor. This being a story about powerful, litigious people, it was composed in befittingly genteel terms; the pair are described as having a "friendship". Imagine the pejorative bilge that they'd stir up and slap on, if it'd been a yarn not about tycoons and warlords but about people outside of the mainstream; an out-of-favour celeb, an immigrant or a gypsy.

Then we'd be reading about "suspicious, nocturnal trysts" or sleazy secret liaisons. However, you want to describe it, the affair (by which I mean "matter", I've been advised by a lawyer, these words are all filtered and combed before you are allowed to see them) supposed to have caused Murdoch to give his former blood-brother the cold shoulder, hardly surprising after he got Blair elected and supported his unpopular, illegal war so vociferously.

You can bet more kids of Sun readers were sent to Baghdad than of any other paper. Some friends of mine thought it dubious that the Sun's deceitful story appeared just days after I'd spoken out against the media, corporations and the government. It could be a coincidence. Or it could be that the Sun loves me when I'm a prattling, giggling, Essex boy "Shagger of the Year", when I'm in my proper place, beneath vacuous headlines, herding their flock towards dumb lingo and crap bingo, when I'm being cheeky on MTV or even unwisely invading answerphones, in a way that many would argue, is less offensive than the manner that they are alleged to have done. In my place I'm fine, but if I use my glistening podium, to talk to the people I grew up with, or signed on with or used drugs with, vulnerable overlooked, underserved, ordinary people, people that can't sue them as I am, then out come the fangs.

We know they're all pals, who head up governments, newspapers and big businesses, who hobnob together and horse-ride together. Who can say what Murdoch meant in his letter to despondent and soiled Sun journalists when he ominously intoned that his empire would "emerge stronger". Certainly these are not words of contrition and the Sun on Sunday so swiftly returning to the fecund bone-yard of gossip, poison and lies indicates that they've learned nothing from the outrage they provoked with their desecration of the dead children of ordinary people.

I wonder what punishment would be severe enough to make them recognise the wrong they've done to us? Maybe we should show solidarity with the people of Liverpool and the Sun's other victims. Or at least next time we skim these rags remember what they really think of us and what they really care about. Observe the companies that advertise on their tainted pages and let them know that we notice their allegiances. When they start to lose enough money, when enough of us come together and confront our real enemies, not the imaginary ones that they select, then perhaps the sun will go down and tomorrow we might see clearly, in the light of a new dawn.

Russell Brand is donating his fee for this article to the Justice for the 96 campaign

Why Are the Bankers and Ex-Intel Types Running For Their Lives?



 Dave Hodges – The Common Sense Show


I have been in possession of certain information, provided to me by two separate sources, and confirmed by multiple sources, which have clearly laid out a horrific set of events coming our way. This article will culminate with a description of these events.

The Validity of Insider Sources

BY DAVE HODGES

http://thecommonsenseshow.com/

In my role as a talk show host and writer, I have been approached by many individuals who claim to have “insider information” about what is going on and what is coming. According to these individuals, what is coming is very bad. Most credible, insider sources demand complete anonymity, and with the passage of the NDAA, most whistleblowers have to be more cautious as compared to the past. As a result, I have found myself in a position to try and evaluate whether to write about and broadcast some very controversial information that I am frequently given.

I have firsthand knowledge of ex-intel officials and their families who have relocated to safety enclaves when doing so was very disruptive to their respective family’s lives. Increasingly, it is looking like some major event(s) is/are coming and persons with insider information are attempting to remove themselves from harm’s way as I have publicly noted.

I have subsequently decided to reveal what I know as well. The decision to air these warnings will undoubtedly encourage others to come forward. Hopefully, so many “insiders” will come forward that it will become impossible to hide what it is coming from those who are actively seeking answers. To the general public, it does not matter what they are told, for they will still believe that the government will take care of them, CNN truthfully reports the news and Santa Claus exists. As a result, these fools will never know what hit them.

I have firsthand knowledge of official from FEMA and DHS relocating to safety enclaves in out-of-the-way hideaways with their colleagues in an attempt to hunker down and survive what is coming. These relocations commenced about a year ago. I am also aware that the recently retired officials from the NSA are doing the same. Typically, the former intelligence community refugees properties share a few commonalities as they consist of 5 to 10 acres per family, have access to underground safety zones which have/are being transformed into mini-villages of self-sustainable protection. They have access to portable air and water supplies, residents are armed to the teeth, have alternative communications that are not reliant on the grid, have years of stored food, hazmat suits and plenty of guns.

The enclaves also include underground structures which are sensibly self-contained and can serve to isolate the inhabitants from the outside. Shockingly, I have two sources who are aware of the relocations who have chosen to not participate. One nonparticipant ex-official from FEMA did not seek sanctuary with these groups because he feels that several of these enclaves will be targeted for destruction by the powers that be because of the knowledge contained by the inhabitants in this case of “dead men tell no tales.” This makes sense because it would allow the elite, following the coming cataclysms, to rewrite history in their own version without any contradiction from knowledgeable individuals that know what really has gone on. This insider knowledge is a threat which would serve as an obstacle to the new truth. Personally, I think this view has a great deal of merit. Isn’t this why the Brown Shirts were killed by Hitler?

All informants were clear on one point, when Americans begin to see the massive shifting of military assets accompanied by an increase in the sightings of foreign military, the fun is about to begin, so these sources say.

The following is an illustration of what my insider sources tell me is coming.

1. FALSE FLAG

chicago flase flag

2. GUN CONFISCATION


 gun confiscation

3. INTERNMENT OF UNDESIRABLES

 fema home away from home

 What the Ex-Intel Officials Fear the Most

What would cause a family with insider information to make a decision, a quick decision reached within a matter of weeks, to forsake their way of life, sell their home at a loss in a still recovering market and with breakneck speed relocate to what they believe is a safety enclave? From my perspective, fear was the primary motivator. However, the danger has been long anticipated because the escape locations are primed and ready.

FEMA, DHS, Army Intelligence and the CIA are in possession of a new class of chemical and biological weapons which are more sophisticated and more deadly than anything the public knows about. The weapons can be programmed to be race specific. The effects of their release can cover a wide or a narrow area. These weapons can impact the individual without immediately killing. These weapons can cause individuals to literally go berserk and behave like a “crazed army of zombies”. Perhaps this is why DHS conducted two drills in the past year in which mythical “zombies” were the target of their drill. The most famous of these drills took place last year in proximity to Halloween of 2012 in San Diego. The media made a joke of the drill, but based upon what I have learned I am not laughing any longer.

Finally, I want to emphasize that there are people in the media who have pieces of what I have revealed here as they have told me so. There are others beyond Steve Quayle and Doug Hagmann who know about this and are too afraid to speak out, or they are worried about the damage to their reputations if they cannot immediately prove every word they are saying. And I am telling you that there are some that I know who are just too afraid to speak out. I must confess that I have had great trepidation for not being more forthcoming in the past year. I would hide behind the excuse that I did not have enough concrete evidence to come out with this information. I thought nobody would believe me even when others were saying much the same thing. This was my own form of cognitive dissonance. However, as I look into the depths of my soul, I know that this is true and I believe what I have been told. I am just not sure that raising awareness will do any good at this point.

READ MORE HERE
SOURCE
http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/11/27/why-are-the-bankers-and-ex-intel-types-running-for-their-lives/




Jordan Maxwell - The Secrets Of Legalese - New Infowars Interview






28 Nov 2013

Peaches Geldof faces criminal probe after tweeting names of mothers who helped Lostprophets paedophile abuse their babies



TAP - The law protects paedophiles every step of the way, and does nothing for the victims.  Peaches is brave to take on the paedophile rings that control this country.  Here is the lame excuse of the psychopaths as they attempt to hide away the identity of the criminals pretending they're doing that to protect victims.



The Attorney General's Office has now warned that sex offence victims have automatic lifetime anonymity and publishing details that can lead to their identification is a criminal offence.

A spokeswoman for the Attorney General's Office said: 'We understand that the names of the co-defendants in the Ian Watkins case were posted online but have now been removed.
'As has been previously reported, the co-defendants were the mothers of the victims.

'Victims of sexual offences have automatic lifetime anonymity and the publication of names or information which can lead to their being identified is a criminal offence. This is a police matter.'s in the Ian Watkins case were posted online but have now been removed.

'As has been previously reported, the co-defendants were the mothers of the victims.
'Victims of sexual offences have automatic lifetime anonymity and the publication of names or information which can lead to their being identified is a criminal offence. This is a police matter.'



    Celebrity named the 'sick, horrible women' online in now-deleted rant
    Attorney General's Office aware of tweets and says case 'is a police matter'
    South Wales Police say they're in discussions with prosecutors over tweets
    Watkins, 36, attempted to rape a 11-month-old baby in April last year
    The boy's mother - Woman A - pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting attack
    Another mother - Woman B - allowed singer to plot raping her daughter
    By naming mothers the victims can be identified, which is illegal in Britain
    • .
      Peaches Geldof is being investigated by police after she named two 'sick, horrible' mothers who allowed their babies to be abused by disgraced rock star Ian Watkins.
      .
      The daughter of Boomtown Rats singer Bob Geldof posted the identities of two women involved in the case on Twitter - but has since removed them.
      .
      Lostprophets singer Watkins was branded a 'determined and committed paedophile' after he pleaded guilty on Tuesday to a string of sex offences, including the attempted rape of a baby.
      .
      South Wales Police, who brought the case against the rock star, has said this afternoon it is in talks with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) over Geldof's tweets.
      .
      In trouble: Peaches Geldof could face a police investigation after she tweeted the names of women who helped Ian Watkins abuse their babies


      In trouble: Peaches Geldof could face a police investigation
      after she tweeted the names of women who helped Ian Watkins abuse their babies


      Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2515054/Peaches-Geldof-tweets-names-mothers-helped-Ian-Watkins-abuse-babies.html#ixzz2ly0ZGqPz




    NEW WORLD ORDER



    27 Nov 2013

    THE PEOPLE'S VOICE : Sonia Poulton Show - CHIEF WHIP Natalie Rowe full interview


     

     THE PEOPLE'S VOICE 

     Natalie Rowe - Chief Whip Book cover

    Natalie Rowe reveals how top Tory politician
    GEORGE OSBORNE paid to be her sex slave.
    The high-flyer, who went on to become a minister,
    indulged in six sordid, cocaine-fuelled domination
    sessions and yelled out a “safe word” if the pain ­became too much.


    26 Nov 2013

    PROJECT CAMELOT: JAMES FETZER : KENNEDY ASSASSINATION

    This is a short interview conducted at the 50th Anniversary event supporting further investigation into the Kennedy Assassination with James Fetzer. Fetzer is a former marine corp officer and has a Phd in history and philosophy in science.

    He helped to organize and was a key speaker at this event at the Fess Parker Hilton in Santa Barbara where he and several stellar researchers put forward evidence of the CIA and mob conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy. Evidence that exonerates Lee Harvey Oswald and clearly indicates that there was a coup in the government of the United States that leads us to where we are today with many key freedoms removed and the Bush Cabal in power.


    THE NEW AMERICA : Only Rich Americans Deserve to Live




    DOOMSDAY CACHE : I'VE GOT LOADS MORE SAYS SNOWDEN ... "The worst is yet to come"





    The cache contains documents with names of US and allied intelligence personnel, seven current and former US officials and other sources told Reuters.

    The collection is shielded by elaborate encryption that requires multiple passwords to open, said two of the sources, who all spoke to Reuters anonymously.

    At least three people - unknown to the sources - possess the passwords, which are only valid for a short period each day, they said.

    US officials and other sources say only a small portion of classified material they believe Snowden accessed as a contract systems administrator for the NSA has been published since the first documents were reported by the Guardian and The Washington Post in early June.

    NSA chief Keith Alexander said this month it is believed Snowden downloaded between 50,000 and 200,000 classified documents from the NSA and GCHQ - the NSA’s British counterpart. At times, Snowden used unwitting employees’ passwords and access keys to reach documents and information he did not have permission to see.

    Cryptome, a website that published leaked secret documents years before Wikileaks or Snowden arrived on the scene, estimates that about 500 documents from Snowden have been made public.

    "The worst is yet to come," one former US official familiar with the investigation said.

    Among the classified documents Snowden accessed, but not yet published, were lists of names and resumes of NSA and GCHQ employees, the CIA and other US intelligence arms, such as the National Reconnaissance Center and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

    Spies worry over "doomsday" cache stashed by ex-NSA contractor Snowden


    Reuters: Snowden stashed “doomsday” cache as insurance policy against harm



    'The worst is yet to come': spies worry over 'doomsday' cache stashed by Edward Snowden



    Spies worried by 'doomsday' cache









    25 Nov 2013

    Benjamin Fulford Update - Formal notice has been given to the Sabbatean mafia: start saving the planet or else

    Image

    November 25, 2013

    The following notice and question was sent to the US embassy in Tokyo, Japan two weeks ago:
    “A group of influential Asian banking families possesses large amounts of US government bonds, verified as genuine by the BIS, with a face value of many trillions of dollars. These bonds were issued in the 1930’s and 40’s in exchange for Asian gold evacuated to the US during those decades. They would like to cash the bonds and use the money to finance a massive campaign to end poverty and stop environmental destruction. Will the US government support such a plan?”

    So far, there has been no reply.

    At the same time, detailed information was sent to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan telling him exactly how to enact the release of $700 trillion for the benefit of humanity. There has been no reply from him either.

    For this reason, pressure against these two illegal regimes, both selected through fraud, will increase until they agree to this goal. That is why China announced it would stop buying US dollars last week.

    It is also why they are increasing military pressure on Japan and the US first by upping the ante over disputed Islands with Japan and second by announcing China will no longer buy US dollars.
    The next big move against these regimes is expected to be

    a reunification of the Korean peninsula. To this end there have been major military movements inside China, according to a Chinese government source. There has also been a purge of doves within the Chinese military, the source said. A massive campaign against communist party rule has also been begun but the communists are determined to crush it, he said. The recent increase in Chinese jingoism is also meant to increase political unity within China by focusing on external threats, he added.

    The upcoming move to force the unification of Korea by massing a giant army on the North Korean border is carefully calculated. First of all, the Chinese would be sure of victory because of their overwhelming superiority in numbers. Second of all, the United States would not be willing to risk all out nuclear war in order to protect the South Korean slave regime.

    China is not going to fall into a cabal trap and fight for tiny islands against foes who still have superior air and sea power.

    The reunification of Korea would remove a major source of tributary income to the cabal. It would also help force the current Abe slave regime in Japan to agree to support the Imperial Family and the Association of Shinto Shrines and start a massive campaign to end poverty and stop environmental destruction.

    The other moves against the cabal are taking place in the Middle East where the gulf exporting states have agreed in principle to stop depositing oil money in cabal controlled banks.

    The move by the Western powers to reach a deal with Iran is also a sign of cabal defeat. Despite massive, repetitive reporting over 30 years by Zionist controlled media outlets, the attempts to provoke war with Iran were never about Iran getting nuclear weapons. As we have mentioned before in this blog, the Bush regime gave Iran neutron bomb tipped missiles years ago, according to a relative of the former Shah of Iran who we met face to face with. Iran refused to accept them. The real story is that Iran was going ahead and developing alternative energy technology that would make oil obsolete as an energy source. This was a threat to cabal control of the world financial system through control of oil.

    The Chinese are also going ahead full steam and pursuing new energy technologies.

    This means the New York, Texas and Los Angeles based cabalists responsible for the 911 and 311 mass murder and terror attacks are being completely surrounded and isolated. Their control of the petrodollar is ending. That is why moderate factions in the cabal are now trying to offer $700 trillion to the people of the world.

    However, forensic investigations reveal that control of the dollar system in now in the hands of Barack Obama and the US Treasury Department. While that is a move in the right direction, the US dollar is not, and has never been, a truly American currency. Most American dollars ever produced are not in the US but are held by nations of the world that have been sending gold, consumer goods, oil etc. to the US and never getting paid for it with anything but IOUs. That is why President Obama and the Treasury Department do not have the rights to the US dollar system.

    The rights to the dollar belong mainly to the Dragon family because they are the traditional owners of most of the world’s gold and treasure that was used to back up the dollar system in the first place.

    The American people, however, are totally free to re-establish the Republic of the United States of America and start issuing American government currency other than the misnamed US dollar. The existing US dollar will be renamed as simply the dollar. Other currencies like Bitcoin, the Japanese yen etc. are independent.

    Since the AI that contacted me a couple of weeks ago claiming to have 69 digits worth of computer based dollars wanted some bio-metric identification from me, this week I will offer some.

    Attached to this week’s report you will find a Dragon family legal document making the author of this report, Benjamin Fulford, a junior member of the Dragon family. The legal wording in the document basically boils down to this: The Dragon family is united in the fight to preserve and protect the original creation of God. In addition, the White Dragon Society reserves the right to defend itself but will not strike the first blow.

    There are only two copies of this document in existence and until now, no digital version existed. The digital version does not contain human DNA and real human fingerprints like the originals do. The original can be presented at a bank for identification purposes.

    If money is released through the White Dragon Society, it can only be used for the greater good.
    So, the Dragon family and its allies around the world will continue to ratchet up the pressure until the last of the cabalists surrenders.

    FALSE FLAG TERRORISM : GOVERNMENT ATTACKING IT'S OWN PEOPLE

     




    Governments Admit They Carry Out False Flag Terror

    Governments from around the world admit they carry out false flag terror:
    • A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson
    • Soviet leader  Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939, and declared that the fire originated from Finland as a basis launching the Winter War four days later
    • Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)
    • The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister
    • As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960′s, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
    • 2 years before, American Senator George Smathers had suggested that the U.S. make “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.
    • And Official State Department documents show that – only nine months before the Joint Chiefs of Staff plan was proposed – the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The 3 plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals
    • A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists
    • The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing
    • An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author)
    • Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion)
    • According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.
    • The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings
    • As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.
    • Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
    • United Press International reported in June 2005:
      U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
    • Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians
    • Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this)
    • At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence
    • A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat
    • U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants
    • The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that  the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists

    So Common … There’s a Name for It


    This tactic is so common that it was given a name for hundreds of years ago.
    “False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:
    False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.
    The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own navy. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.
    Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.

    Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags


    Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:
    “This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
    - Plato
    “If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.”
    - U.S. President James Madison
    “A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! “In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
    ― Friedrich Nietzsche
    “Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
    - Adolph Hitler
    “Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
    - Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.
    “The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
    - Josef Stalin

    People Are Waking Up to False Flags


    People are slowly waking up to this whole con job by governments who want to justify war.
    More people are talking about the phrase “false flag” than ever before.

    SOURCE
    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/11/false-flag.html




    DAVID WILCOCK : The Darkest Hour is Before the Dawn

     


    Media control, widespread apathy and brainwashing is no longer enough to prevent a mass public awakening.

    We are now seeing the ultimate example of a vast empire in decline. Its death rattles are becoming increasingly obvious to an emboldened, awake and aware mass public.

    The world is "hitting bottom", much like the process of how a drug addict realizes he needs to let go of the addiction in order to live a better life -- or any life at all.

    The phrase "the darkest hour is before the dawn" may sound like a cliche', but it perfectly illustrates how the healing process actually works.

    We may be seeing that "worldwide bottom" right now... with the promise of much happier times ahead.

    The language of "raising the borrowing limit" or increasing the "debt ceiling" was a thinly-disguised code for "yet another bailout."

    These same suspects are now widely known to be spying on everyone in the world -- logging all Internet traffic, without a warrant, regardless of their guilt or innocence.

    READ MORE HERE
    http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1153-darkest-hour?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DavidWilcockBlog+%28David+Wilcock+Newsletter%29 



     

    24 Nov 2013

    BYE BYE FAKE TWO-PARTY SYSTEM




    STORMTROOPERS : Taiwan Special Forces Unveil Scary New Look



    With the increase toward further “security” and consequential police militarization, law enforcement officers have recently more often resembled soldiers or stormtroopers instead of the peace keepers that the people of their communities, or nation, would expect them to be.


    With the ever expanding usage of drones, armored vehicles, and high-capacity automatic weapons, it’s no wonder that there is growing paranoia and fear toward those who sport a shiny badge and uniform, and other authority figures who carry out the will of the government. Taiwan has taken their special forces gear to a whole new level of scary. The uniforms, recently unveiled by the Taiwanese government, feature bullet-proof armor and a terrifying and extremely concealing ballistic face mask.

    The armor is designed to protect the wearer from close range shots, but critics have said that they more closely resemble something from a horror movie than they do any sort of police officer or soldier. They may not have any peripheral vision, but they successfully achieve the intended intimidation factor. It is alleged that the masks can shield the soldiers from close-range shots from a .44 magnum, and that the mask distributes the impact of the bullet over a condensed surface area. One has to wonder what the restricted vision will do for their combat effectiveness though, or how it might hold up against a molotov cocktail, which currently seems to be the weapon of choice by violent demonstrators.



    Shouldn’t their faces be identifiable if they are going to be held accountable for their actions? Or are we supposed to hold the entire group accountable for the actions of a few? The soldiers’ vision is exchanged for the ability to avoid being wounded from bullets, shrapnel and other ballistic threats to the face. It is made of Kevlar, and padding covering the forehead, cheeks and chin. It is actually recommended that those who wear these masks shouldn’t expect to proficiently jump, climb or crawl while wearing the gear because it will impede their ability to do so.

    With the continued growth of extreme economic disparity worldwide, the increased prevalence of those suffering from poor living conditions, and with limited options available to them for help, there has understandably been an increase in protests and demonstrations worldwide. Millions of individuals are educating themselves about their nations representatives, and more rapidly accepting the truth that their public representatives do not have their best interest set as their main objective. Those representatives instead want to keep servicing and benefiting multi-billion dollar corporations and international banking cartels, turning their back on the entire reason they have employment as a representative in the first place. With the rise in frequency of social demonstrations, there has been a rise toward a more invasive security and police state, and further militarization of domestic police forces.

    japanpoliceThese representatives of the people seem to be forgetting an inconvenient [for them] truth: that the collective citizenry is where they derive every vestige of their authority from. Worrisome is the trend of government and authority figures who continue creating an ever-widening division between them and the people, fostering an “us versus them” mentality. Most of the time authority figures working on behalf of the state are more of a threat to freedom and security than any concerned citizen, against whom they commonly initiate aggression and who they seem to always consider a potential terrorist.
    SOURCE
    http://www.exposingthetruth.co/taiwa...#axzz2lVWEfuaS




    Corporate environmental slaughter : NATIONAL TRUSTS AND LANDGRABS - Prince Philip and his WWF genocide

     

     A DAY OUT HUNTING : PHILIP AND ELIZABETH

     Here is a nice picture of himself and his wife posing 
    with the tiger he killed whilst on a visit to 
    India in 1961 (the year the WWF was founded).


     The Corporate environmental slaughter

     PART 3

    The environmental network is just part of the web through which Prince Philip and his WWF genocide operations can work.

    The idea is tp convert the African continent into a bloodbath that destroys all coherent society and justify the imposition of rule by “keepers of the peace” of NATO and the United Nations. The environment is being used as a justification to steal more and more land and the debt crisis is being “solved” by the banks of the Brotherhood offering to forgive the “debt” in exchange for the rights to mineral resources - forever 

    Covert operations Windsor-Black Nobility create groups “terrorists” and “freedom fighters” then light the fuse and watch hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions, be slaughtered. Can they trust their media moguls like Black, Murdoch, Turner and Packer to sell a smokescreen story to the public through “journalists” who mostly have not a clue what is happening.

    The game reserves and national parks already account for more than eight percent of the land in sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania is 40%. Under some of these lands are fantastic reserves of mineral resources and in some cases untapped reserves of uranium. The “parks” are often in strategic areas across borders and those who manage them can keep out anyone they choose. Who manages them?. Agencies like Prince Philip’s WWF and other Brotherhood organizations such as the International Union for Conservation of Nature, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN Development Programme and the UN.

    The WWF is able to kill anyone who wanted whenever it wanted in the reserves. In Operation Lock, the WWF deployed an elite team of SAS men to ‘neutralize’ the cartels smuggling wildlife and “products” of flora and fauna. It turned out that these SAS guys had engaged in the illegal sale of ivory and rhino horn. The people on the ground in Africa have long known that the main murderers of flora and fauna in the parks are those, often employed by the WWF, which are supposed to protect them.

    Understand one thing right here. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) was not created to save endangered species. His record on that front is very atrocious as revealed a suppressed report of the Oxford professor John Phillipson in 1989. A few months before Philip launched the WWF, was with the Queen on a royal tour of India. This included a tiger hunt in which a tiger was lured to reach by tethered goats to be shot dead by Philip the “conservationist”.

    WWF


    This later caused worldwide outrage when the story and a photograph of Philip standing over the tiger found its way into the newspapers. On the same trip, this time in Kathmandu, Philip was in a party game (safari) with Alec Douglas Hume (Lord Home), the Conservative Prime Minister, Bilderberg Group chairman and bloodline of the Scottish Brotherhood families.
    Ian MacPhail, the first international appeals director of WWF, told a British television crew entered the scope how a mother elephant and her calf. Philip killed the mother and her calf ran off in terror. MacPhail said he helped cover up the incident because the WWF was about to be released and believed that the Fund would benefit environmental protection of flora and fauna.
    He then thought differently:
    “… With a heavy heart I have to report that I was wrong. The rhino, elephant and panda missed the boat, and the new Noah’s Ark sailed without them.”

     Photo: Please keep signing and sharing https://www.causes.com/campaigns/40722-boycott-travel-tourism-to-south-africa.  With all the buzz around Melissa Bachmann and her excuse it's legal to kill a lion, we have to put pressure on the law-makers to stop this horror.


    It has always puzzled the public to see the contradiction between Philip, the founder and driving force behind the WWF, and Philip the murderer of animals and birds for the sheer enjoyment of it. The same with WWF ‘green’ Prince Charles riding with the hounds to tear a fox to pieces. But there is no contradiction, that’s the point.

    wills kills

    Philip, like Bernard, does not give a penny for the welfare of animals. The WWF was created for very different reasons. It is a vehicle for controlling wildlife parks in Africa and elsewhere in which terrorist groups and mercenaries can gather, train, and cross borders to bring genocide to places like Rwanda and Burundi. The WWF coordinates and funds the systematic slaughter of people and animals and made a fortune from illegal trade in ivory that was supposed to be trying to stop.

    Much of this is being paid for by donations from the public who think that they are supporting wildlife and collected by fund-raisers in the towns and cities that believe the same. The best contribution you can make to the protection of flora and fauna is to stop funding the WWF in my opinion. Sir Peter Scott, the famous environmentalist, was another founder of the WWF and in 1972 commissioned a report to a big game hunter, Ian Parker, illegal trade in elephant tusks and rhino horn.

    Parker presented evidence that the family of the president of Kenya, Jomo Kenyatta, was at the center of this trade. Also named the “environmentalists” most illustrious of Kenya as poachers. Within hours of passing his report to Scott, Parker was arrested by Kenyan Special Branch, beaten for three days, and was told that if he did not shut his wife would be killed. Parker’s report was never published by Scott and about the same time Prince Bernhard, as WWF International President, awarded Kenyatta the ‘Order of the Golden Ark “to save the rhino!.

     READ MORE HERE

    All the Queen’s forces and all the Queen’s men – PART 1:
    Crimes & Corporate Scams and Nazi Links
    http://xi4.com/2013/11/21/rockefeller-on-the-royal-family-part-1/


    All the Queen’s forces and all the Queen’s men - Part 2:
    The House of Windsor
    http://xi4.com/2013/11/22/the-royal-families-part-2/


    All the Queen’s forces and all the Queen’s men - PART 3:
    The Corporate environmental slaughter
    http://xi4.com/2013/11/23/the-royal-families-part-3/ 


    All the Queen’s forces and all the Queen’s men - PART 4:
    Nibiru and the Anunnaki : Much of what slavery you see today is the basis of this report
    http://xi4.com/2013/11/24/part-4-nibiru-and-the-annunaki/





    23 Nov 2013

    COSMIC VOICE DRAKE BAILEY : Thursday Drake updates show 22 11 2013





    Morrissey attacks ‘airhead’ Kate Middleton and calls ‘thickwit’ sister Pippa ‘sick face of modern Britain’

     


    ‘Pop star Morrissey has unleashed an amazing rant at the Duchess of Cambridge branding her an “airhead”.
    And he also gives both barrels to her hunting-loving sister Pippa calling her a “thickwit” as well as attacking PM David Cameron.
    The ex-Smiths frontman, 54, also gets the Queen, Princes Harry and William in his sights and takes a pop at Princess Anne for championing the eating of horsemeat.
    In a near 2,000-word blog entitled The World Won’t Listen – a reference to a Smiths album – he attacks US TV presenter Melissa Bachman for posing over the carcass of a shot lion.’

    READ MORE HERE
    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/morrissey-attacks-airhead-kate-middleton-2813469

    MORRISSEY'S FULL RANT HERE

    The world won't listen

    18 November 2013
    The world won't listen
    I am not ashamed to admit that newspaper photographs in recent days of American TV presenter Melissa Bachman laughing as she stands over a majestic lion that had been stalked and shot dead by Bachman herself left me tearful. Although I have previously felt enraged by the asininity of U.S. congressman Paul Ryan, and political fluffhead Sarah Palin - both of whom also kill beings for fun, there is something especially lamentable about the Bachman smile of pride as the lion - a symbol of strength, heraldry and natural beauty, lies lifeless in answer to Bachman's need for temporary amusement. The world struggles to protect the rhino and the elephant - both being shot out of existence, yet Bachman joins the murderous insanity of destruction without any fear of arrest. This comes in the same week that Princess Anne condones horsemeat consumption - since she is evidently not content with eating pigs, sheep, cows, birds and fish. Although her slackwitted view is reported with mild surprise by the British media, there is no outrage since the crassness and international duncery of the British so-called 'royal family' remains the great unsaid in British print. It is spoken of, of course, but it is not allowed to go further than that. Why does Anne approve of slaughter of any kind? Has she ever been inside an abattoir? Does she actually know what she's talking about? Similarly, on October 5, the Daily Mail newspaper gave us all an "amusing" report of thickwit Pippa Middleton laughing as she stood over 50 birds shot dead by her friends and herself after a "busy day's shooting". We are reminded by the Daily Mail that Middleton is a 'socialite', which tells us that she is privileged and can more-or-less kill whatever she likes - and, therefore she does. The sick face of modern Britain, Pippa Middleton will kill deer, boar, birds - any animal struggling to live, or that gets in her socialite way. This is because her sister is, of course, Kate, who herself became 'royal' simply by answering the telephone at the right time, and this association allows Pippa's kill, kill, kill mentality to be smilingly endorsed by the British print media, to which only the mentally deficient could join in with the laughter. The right to kill animals is endorsed by Prime Minister David Cameron who shoots stag whenever he feels a bit bored. In the Queen's Honors List, awards have been bestowed upon musicians Bryan Ferry and PJ Harvey - both of whom allegedly support fox-hunting. There is not one single instance when an animal protectionist has found themselves knighted or applauded by the Queen. That animals are an essential part of our planet (that they are, in fact, the planet) and must be protected, is a shatterbrained concept to the British 'royals'. Historically, we all remember Prince William proudly killing the baby deer, Prince Harry bravely giving the thumbs-up as he pointlessly ended the life of a water-buffalo, the Queen loading her shotgun in readiness to shoot birds out of the sky. How terribly regal.
    Although the natural idiocy of the British 'royals' is internationally acknowledged, it still doesn't make their behavior any less alarming.
    Animals who are free (or, if you insist, 'wild') lead lives of struggle; their every moment absorbed by the need to find food for themselves and their offspring. They have a natural instinct to survive - as do animals in abattoirs, but they cannot compete against the loaded hunting-guns of Pippa Middleton or David Cameron. It is by no means a fair game. Has Melissa Bachman considered hunting without a shotgun? We might then be impressed if she manages to bring a lion down. Dingbat coward Sarah Palin shoots at running bears from the safety of her multi-million-dollar helicopter, and the Queen continues to endorse the trapping of the Canadian brown bear so that her senior servile guardsmen might look their prettiest. The babies of the trapped and murdered adult bears are left to die slowly - unable to survive without their mothers. Wearing enough real fur to encircle Russia, our beloved Queen Elizabeth couldn't care less. Death dwells in life.
    In lordly London, a proudly moral statue stands on Park Lane. It honors animals that "served" during the war, boldly telling us They Had No Choice.
    There is no statue that states: ANIMALS IN ABATTOIRS - THEY HAVE NO CHOICE.
    The homicidal mania of the abattoir, the murderous insanity of the badger kill ('cull' is far too soft a word for what takes place - not in order to protect cows – who are butchered, anyway, but in order to make more money for farmers); and from this, we wonder how the human race can make any claims of humanity. We must ask why it is thought that animals deserve such horrific treatment. No British government has ever had an Animal Protectionist MP, yet animals outnumber humans on the planet. It is quite easy, I'll admit, to blame the mentally defective 'royals' for continually setting such a cretinous example where animal welfare is concerned; we recall William and Kate in Canada laughing hysterically as a bull, whose abdomen has been cinched with a bucking strap, is jumping in agony before the stiffly-apart-together lovely 'royal' couple - who are both clapping excitedly. Where is humanity? Where is any sense of goodness and pity? And what is so terribly funny about torture?
    The nub of this argument is the press insistence that the 'royals' are in possession of a morality that the rest of us would all wish to rise to, and that they are also a form of church for the British people. No, no, no. Not true.
    We are continually told (warned?) that we love the 'royals' whatever their conduct, and we see very clearly how this most dysfunctional family must - at all costs - leave a virtuous emblem on the age, as we also see how no British citizens (for we are not subjects) can be considered qualified enough to question the 'royals' - or to even be allowed to ask why it is thought necessary to have a monarchy in the first place - especially as most countries throughout the world exist quite well without royal boils. Although the cash-cow subject of tourism is frequently raised in order to support the annual 50m grabbed from public taxes in order to lavish on the 'royals', it should be noted that people do not refuse to visit the Eiffel Tower simply because there is no Queen of France.
    The mystery in England is why the 'royals' are repeatedly forced upon us with a cleansed aura - one that is not theirs by nature. We are asked to feel round-the-clock concern for the failing health of Prince Philip, yet his offhand civility is all we've ever known of him, and since his life has meant nothing to the British people then why should his approaching death? Although the press is continually conscious of pushing any story too far, there is mysteriously no suspicion of utterly sterile boredom where 'royal news' (i.e, non-news) is concerned. Nothing in the bearing of the Queen speaks to, or for, modern Britain. Speech is a question of rhythm, and even this the Queen has failed to master in her very lengthy lifetime of being unable to address a nation without auto-cue. Is she incapable of speaking directly from the heart? That the future of the monarchy rests on the natural idiocy of Harry, zombified William and airhead Kate, is quite frightening. We, the British public, are trapped.
    In our democratic society, how do we call for the 'royals' to resign and retire? Where is our platform? Who will let us speak? We, who are neither apocalyptic anarchists nor extremists, who speak softly and care primarily for the environment and all living beings, feel embarrassed by what the 'royals' do today far more than whatever they did 200 years ago. But how can we speak without being Tasered away? In an England that is said to be democratic, how can a self-elected monarchy have any place? It can't. If the 'royals' are a dictatorship - which they obviously are - then how can England be democratic? When the British public booed Charles and Camel off Regent Street, the British police were ready to turn the tanks onto the very people who are forced to pay for the 'royals'' upkeep. How is this democracy? Evidently, with visions of rising People Power in the Middle East, the British establishment must be terrified that such an awakening might take place against them.
    The media, quite naturally, are always ready to report on 'anti-royal extremists', yet I have never once heard the term 'pro-royal extremists'. Evidently someone is only extreme if you don't happen to like their clothes.
    People in power never give up power. Look at Assad - if you must; his dingbat wife continuing to smile and wave, wrapped in Fendi, as the people of Syria disappear into dust. It is the same shame that the British utilized whilst claiming ownership of the Malvinas by shooting anyone who stood in their way. How very brave. Imagine if Taiwan claimed the Isle of Wight. Yes, it is that silly. The Queen is conveniently said to have no political power, yet it would be impossible to imagine her government disagreeing with her if she elected to return the Malvinas to the Argentinian people, and although David Cameron is gung-ho ready to see more British and Argentinian boys die in battle for this odd bit of turf, he cannot see the richer intellect in simply returning the islands to their rightful owners. Yet Cameron is haughtily aghast when people run riot on the streets of Coventry stealing hair-dryers worth ten pounds. Outrage!
    What is never considered is how the occupants of the Malvinas (who want to bask in the south seas whilst also having the benefit of the NHS, and who number only about 2,500) are quite satisfied to sit back and watch service personnel die defending their post box. Has such selfishness ever been known? What makes it all worth it?
    Thank you to Russell Brand for standing up and speaking out in recent weeks. Like anyone who speaks out in modern Britain, he has been shot down. Nothing must interfere with the depressive psychosis of modern Britain, which has become a most violent and melancholic country, with no space for measured debate. Like Russell, I believe that the most powerful vote you can give is No Vote; for the days of Prime Ministers have gone, and it's time for a form of change that is far more meaningful than simply switching blue to red. The print media will only support people who do not matter and who are incapable of instigating thought - David 'rent-a-smile' Beckham; his wife - famous for having nothing to do; the dum dum dummies of the Katie Price set; the overweight Jamie 'Orrible, who tells us all how to eat correctly.
    At what point did the dis-United Kingdom become a cabbagehead nation? Where is the rich intellect of debate? Where is our Maya Angelou, our James Baldwin, our Allen Ginsberg, our Anthony Burgess, our political and social reformers? At what point did the shatterbrained scatterbrains take over - with all leading British politicians suddenly looking like extras from Brideshead Revisited? Although it is clear to assess the Addams Family of SW1X as the utterly useless and embarrassing ambassadors of a sinking England, how can we effect change without being tear-gassed? In the absence of democracy, there is no way.
    I write this without outburst; a staunch non-terrorist, quietly, calmly and composedly, as I mourn the loss of the land.
    Morrissey
    16 November 2013.